-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
--[PinePGP]--[begin]--
Ferris McCormick wrote:
You asked for patches. Both of these are incorporated in the 6.8.99
series, and have been around long
The following packages will be removed from Portage in 48 hours, unless
someone steps up to fix the corresponding security bugs - and takeover
upstream when it's dead :)
app-emulation/glukalka (bug 70666)
No upstream and vulnerable to multiple tempfile vulns and race
conditions, this package has
So to sum it up, it's not really (for me maybe) about enterprise v. hobbyist,
it's about moving ANYONE over to Linux, period.
Actually, I rather like to think that Gentoo is one of the very few
distributions that cares more about meeting existing Linux
[power]users' needs rather than getting
Athul Acharya wrote:
So to sum it up, it's not really (for me maybe) about enterprise v. hobbyist,
it's about moving ANYONE over to Linux, period.
Actually, I rather like to think that Gentoo is one of the very few
distributions that cares more about meeting existing Linux
[power]users'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I'd prefer to avoid adding patches that are feature enhancements instead
of small fixes, if possible. Is it a problem if we pass on those?
Not really. They are not in
All:
I have bumped gentoolkit to 0.2.1_pre3 and package masked it for
architecture testing and general testing of the new improved
revdep-rebuild. This version contains lots of bug fixes and I would
like give it a workout before unmasking.
There are some major changes in identifying the broken
Hi gang,
I just (again) noticed I'm currently the only active developer of the
desktop-misc herd, which is going to change as soon as the recruitment
process is reopened again.
About 80% of all bugs assigned to desktop-misc are new ebuild
submissions for software which either falls into no other
---BeginMessage---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Would, RESOLVED LATER, with 'need maintainer' in the status whiteboard
not be suitable? for the purpose of pulling queries, it's just as affective.
Robert
Markus Nigbur wrote:
Hi gang,
I just (again) noticed I'm currently the
On Sunday 12 June 2005 02:09, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Sunday 12 June 2005 00:34, Brian wrote:
Am I correct in that the imported instance of portage was still using
the old metadata cache at the time of import? Even though the cache was
updated at the end of the sync. After a sync we should
