-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
| Yeah, but the angle I'm pushing for default IUSE's ...er.. use is
| eliminating no* flags, and giving ebuild maintainers more flexibility
| in breaking the package down into conditionals.
|
| I really don't see -* being all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Ok. You have until whenever I next encounter Jeff to come up with a
| better name, or REVIEWED it is. And it seems I was dreaming about
| bugzilla allowing () stuff after keywords entries (maybe I was thinking
| of one of the
Quoting Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Currently, things assigned to maintainer-wanted get the following
keywords (bugzilla, not ebuild):
* EBUILD if an ebuild is attached
* REQUEST if an ebuild is requested
Ah. I didn't know this was part of the bugzilla policy.
I've been going
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:10:44AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
| Yeah, but the angle I'm pushing for default IUSE's ...er.. use is
| eliminating no* flags, and giving ebuild maintainers more flexibility
| in breaking the package down into conditionals.
|
| I really
I've started the ressurection of the service provided at g.o/stable during the
weekend. The biggest task is the convert the queries from postgresql with
subselects to mysql, but the work is almost finished.
I will be posting the messages to this malinglis once a day as before.
If you have any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Oh come on, haven't you heard my rants about the state of the tree and
the number of monkeys who have commit access?
Yes I've read those rants, among others.. :)
But with everyone screaming 'not enough manpower' the number
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:13:31 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | Ok. You have until whenever I next encounter Jeff to come up with a
| | better name, or REVIEWED it is. And it seems I was dreaming about
| | bugzilla allowing () stuff after keywords entries
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:36:43 -0400 Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| But with everyone screaming 'not enough manpower' the number of devs
| with commit access is just bound to increase. So why not focus on how
| to increase quality by default?
I am doing. I'm doing it by trying to
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:39:26 -0400 Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| I've been going through the EBUILD list at random and providing
| lists of things that need to be fixed before the ebuild can be
| considered for inclusion. The WONTFIX resolution along with a
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 15:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:39:26 -0400 Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| I've been going through the EBUILD list at random and providing
| lists of things that need to be fixed before the ebuild can be
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:20:38 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 15:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:39:26 -0400 Nathan L. Adams
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94764
|
| Will do. There's rather a
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 11:58:00AM +0200, Julien Allanos wrote:
Furthermore, could the bugzilla bug lifecycle
(http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.18/html/lifecycle.html) be referenced
in the bugzilla-howto, or even better, updated with Gentoo workflow
characteristics and included?
For anyone
On Friday 19 August 2005 11:59 am, Simon Holm Thøgersen wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
What I'd like is a new keyword (bugzilla, not ebuild) for indicating
that a developer has done a check on an ebuild and is satisfied that
the ebuild is fine from a style perspective.
Isn't the use of
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 06:20:14PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
For anyone willing to modify it, I've taken it out of bugzilla cvs and
put it in my dev space:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~griffon26/bzLifecycle.xml
Just load it in dia and edit away.
Oh, btw, this is licensed under the GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Nope, because I'm not marking things as I will include this.
According to Bugzilla, it means more like: Contains content that should
be reviewed for integration. Patches, apps/scripts, etc...
which could be used as content
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:55:32 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | Nope, because I'm not marking things as I will include this.
|
| According to Bugzilla, it means more like: Contains content that
| should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:36:43 -0400 Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| But with everyone screaming 'not enough manpower' the number of devs
| with commit access is just bound to increase. So why not focus on how
| to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
*sigh*
Please stay away from that bug. It is assigned to the games team, as it
is a games bug, and it will be gotten to when we have the time and not
before. Nathan is once again using a discussion to fuel his own
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:53:50 -0400 Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Because that won't help in the slightest.
|
| So you're saying that peer review is good, but peer reviewing things
| by default is bad? Explain?
No, I'm saying that having a 'team lead' throw some arbitrary stamp of
On Friday 19 August 2005 08:56 pm, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
In the time it took you to respond to this thread, you probably could
have reviewed the ebuild in question...
thank you for wasting our time with a pointless e-mail
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
20 matches
Mail list logo
