[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-08-28 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11702 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

Re: [gentoo-dev] trouble with make_desktop_entry

2005-08-28 Thread Nick Rout
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:54:41 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 28 August 2005 09:42 pm, Nick Rout wrote: > > 1. the resulting desktop file is called laby-laby.desktop rather than > > just laby.desktop > > the name doesnt matter just ignore it OK > > > 2. the "Comment" in the desktop fil

Re: [gentoo-dev] trouble with make_desktop_entry

2005-08-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 28 August 2005 09:42 pm, Nick Rout wrote: > 1. the resulting desktop file is called laby-laby.desktop rather than > just laby.desktop the name doesnt matter just ignore it > 2. the "Comment" in the desktop file says "Comment=Based on the eutils > eclass" your ebuild is using 'inherit'

[gentoo-dev] trouble with make_desktop_entry

2005-08-28 Thread Nick Rout
I am writing an ebuild and wishing to use make_desktop_entry I have two problems with it: 1. the resulting desktop file is called laby-laby.desktop rather than just laby.desktop 2. the "Comment" in the desktop file says "Comment=Based on the eutils eclass" 1. I am unable to work out at all, exc

Re: [gentoo-dev] use flags in both use.defaults and make.defaults

2005-08-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 28 August 2005 03:36 pm, William Hubbs wrote: > All of these use flags are in base/use.defaults. As I understand it, if > the package listed with the flag in this file is installed on the > system, the flag is automatically turned on. If that's true, why are > they also listed in defaul

Re: [gentoo-dev] use flags in both use.defaults and make.defaults

2005-08-28 Thread warnera6
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > All, > > since there has been a lot of discussion lately about default use flags, > I looked at the profiles and found the following: > > All of these use flags are in base/use.defaults. As I understand it, if > the package listed with the flag

[gentoo-dev] use flags in both use.defaults and make.defaults

2005-08-28 Thread William Hubbs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, since there has been a lot of discussion lately about default use flags, I looked at the profiles and found the following: All of these use flags are in base/use.defaults. As I understand it, if the package listed with the flag in this file is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] autotools support eclass

2005-08-28 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 13:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 28 August 2005 01:43 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysing

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] autotools support eclass

2005-08-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 28 August 2005 01:43 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Sch

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] autotools support eclass

2005-08-28 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysi

[gentoo-dev] Re: why does gcc-3.4.x depend on gcc-3.3.x / libstdc++?

2005-08-28 Thread Sven Köhler
>>I must say I have been wondering about this for a while too. >>A solution might be add some sort of flag to packages that are binary, >>and then let portage install libstdc++ the first time you install this >>kind of package. > > You mean, like have binary packages depend on > virtual/libstdc++-

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] autotools support eclass

2005-08-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 28 August 2005 07:28 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin S

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles

2005-08-28 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 12:01 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Brian Harring wrote: > > > >> I don't recall having kde/gtk crap turned on by default when I first > >> showed up. Maybe I'm missing something; regardless, the defaults > >> (which should be minimal from my st

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] autotools support eclass

2005-08-28 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > > Which reminds me .. anybody going to scream

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles

2005-08-28 Thread Simon Stelling
Donnie Berkholz wrote: Brian Harring wrote: I don't recall having kde/gtk crap turned on by default when I first showed up. Maybe I'm missing something; regardless, the defaults (which should be minimal from my standpoint) are anything but. I think you recall wrong, then. The default USE f