Newer version now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/earch-0.6
Changes:
- optionally include the category in the output
- new mode to list ebuilds suitable for removal from portage (however
this only checks your current profile so far, so be careful still,
this is work in progress).
- NOCOLOR sup
Hi All.
This is to inform interested parties that the split (gnat => gnatgcc, gnatgpl,
gnatpro) that I was describing recently is now functional and I ma ready to
commit the reorganized gnat (p-masked of course at this point). Please see
#111340 for details:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:44:41 +0100
George Shapovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. 2005 stands for the standard revision namme (as in Ada 2005)
> really rather than for a particular version.
To elaborate for those unfamiliar with Ada; this is the same sort of
thing as C89, C99. Enforcing the p
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 01:11:54AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the one true solution:
> - USE=debug *never* changes CFLAGS or LDFLAGS or what have you, it *only*
> enables additional runtime code (such as assert()'s or helpful debug
> output)
Some packages automatically appends stuff to CFLAG
On Sunday 15 January 2006 06:52, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 01:11:54AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > the one true solution:
> > - USE=debug *never* changes CFLAGS or LDFLAGS or what have you, it *only*
> > enables additional runtime code (such as assert()'s or helpful
неділя, 15. січень 2006 12:43, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) Ви написали:
> If the 2005 does turn out to be a release date rather than the
> standard name, then it makes sense as a release version; gnat-gpl-2005
> would be enough. Later releases can add a point revision if necessary;
> if you do 2005.1
On Sun, 2006-15-01 at 01:11 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the one true solution:
> - we add an emerge flag (say '--debug-build') which adds "nostrip" to
> FEATURES
> and auto sets CFLAGS to DEBUG_CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to DEBUG_LDFLAGS
Why not use the splitdebug instead of nostrip? And make buildin
On 1/15/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this topic has come up before too many times and has yet to be solved, and we
> have too many hacks in place
>
> the issues:
> - USE=debug is way too vague; sometimes it builds different code (i.e.
> additional runtime checks, debugging output
неділя, 15. січень 2006 16:03, George Shapovalov Ви написали:
> > If the 2005 does turn out to be a release date rather than the
> > standard name, then it makes sense as a release version; gnat-gpl-2005
> > would be enough. Later releases can add a point revision if necessary;
> > if you do 2005.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 14 January 2006 13:41, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Why stuck on "tos" -- Just spend the other 3 letters and make it tinyos
>> at least, so people can figure out what it actually is.
>
> indeed, it'd still be smaller than dev-embedded :)
> -mike
Actually proposed
Hi list,
Two new developers to tell you about. First up is Martin Ehmsen, who is
going to be helping out with the text-markup herd, i.e. tex ;). He's
already prepared a bit about him:
"I'm a 25 year old Dane living in Odense on Fyn,the central island of
Denmark. I'm studying computer science at
On Sunday 15 January 2006 13:25, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> What would happen on subsequent merges or upgrades if --debug-build
> was omitted? Would there be a way (/etc/portage file perhaps?) to
> enable debug builds on a permanent basis?
i didnt think anyone would want this but it'd be trivial to add
New version again.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/earch-0.7
Changes
- Ignores /etc/portage like repoman by default, but added -f flag to revert to
old behavior.
- Added -i flag to ignore redundant versions (those that would be listed by -r).
I've had a couple of people complain and say that earch
Ahh great! Another candidate for the Danish conspiracy:-)
Welcome onboard Martin!
Also welcome to you Micheal.
-
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Linux Security Team
pgpwEfgiZDkAr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote:
> Ahh great! Another candidate for the Danish conspiracy:-)
Also one for Polish :)
Welcome Martin and Michał :)
- --
Krzysiek 'Nelchael' Pawlik
GPG:0xBC51
/me runs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Welcome :-)
Nice to see some more danes helping out.
Bjarke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDyuWaO+Ewtpi9rLERAvx5AJ988UUsuZTCSvJDj4fYF7Jwg/QiSQCeOowc
Summary of the ppc-meeting on January 15, 2006, 19 UTC.
== 1. 2006.0 release ==
profile:
* currently located in default-linux/ppc/dev/ppc/ppc32/
* small generic ppc profile
* G3 and G4 sub-profiles with "desktop"-use-flags and CFLAGS-optimization
* new: nptl on all profiles (needed a glibc-fix)
Lars Weiler wrote:
== 2. Dev Activity (Who's alive?) ==
Devs seemed to have vanished and even the operational manager isn't around
strategic, not operational, I'm still alive ^^!
(which had happened more often in the past -- probably there is a bane on this
position).
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Another new version again, with bugfixes and cosmetic output changes.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/earch-0.8
Changes:
- keywords are sorted by the order they appear on disk, with the
exception that '-*' will precede it if present.
- All '-arch' flags will always appear in the list if present o
19 matches
Mail list logo
