On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 18:57:53 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I personally am against both of these, mostly due to their
| automational nature.
Indeed. Repoman is significantly stupider than most developers. This is
just asking for trouble.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Ki
On 1/27/06, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> attempt at adding a bit of humor to what otherwise might get too dry
> and technical to be tolerable.
This list _is_ for technical discussion. Please keep it that way.
Thanks.
--
Marcelo Góes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo
Stephen Bennett posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:31:32 +:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:08:40 -0700
> Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Neither here nor there, but for some reason, I prefer "emerge -NuD
>> world". =8^)
>
> Especially since you just said yo
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 18:57 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
> There are a couple of bugs against repoman that request repoman detect
> and do things for the developer. The two cases are:
>
> repoman does not auto-commit new license files[1]
> repoman should cvs add files/ if it isn't already[2]
>
> [1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are a couple of bugs against repoman that request repoman detect
and do things for the developer. The two cases are:
repoman does not auto-commit new license files[1]
repoman should cvs add files/ if it isn't already[2]
I personally am against
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:08:40 -0700
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neither here nor there, but for some reason, I prefer "emerge -NuD
> world". =8^)
Especially since you just said yourself it was irrelevant, I'm at a loss
to see quite why you felt the need to tell us this.
--
gentoo-dev@gent
Sven Vermeulen posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:00:40 +0100:
> (since any breakage due to an "emerge -uDN
> world" can hopefully be fixed by restoring the backup portage tree and run
> "emerge -uDN world" again)
Neither here nor there, but for some reason, I p
On 1/27/06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think he meant that we shouldn't welcome him with "use repoman || die" as
> that's something useful only for ebuild developers :P
Ah, but instead of repoman there is repodoc!
http://dev.gentoo.org/~yoswink/repodoc/
http://dev.ge
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:32:44PM +0100, Jochen Maes wrote:
> yups polish conspiracy is growing...
And will grow further ;>
Witamy w zespole, Shadoww!
--
Pozdrawiam,
Robert 'muchar' Muchacki
Gentoo Staff Member (http://dev.gentoo.org)
Gentoo Forums Moderator (http://forums.gentoo.org)
Gentoo
On Friday 27 January 2006 16:08, MIkey wrote:
> This bug (39318) has persisted since 2004-01-25, with the most recent bite
> reported on 2005-12-07. It is not a problem unique to stage1 or stage3.
> Since portage apparently does not always handle circular dependencies
> gracefully, the problem is
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:42:39 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Email's pretty simple- from where I'm sitting, there doesn't seem to
| be any actual progress on trustees issues.
*prod*
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (King of all Londinium)
Mail: ciaranm at gento
On Friday 27 January 2006 16:37, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Somebody please translate this to Polish?
I think he meant that we shouldn't welcome him with "use repoman || die" as
that's something useful only for ebuild developers :P
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameey
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:32:44PM +0100, Jochen Maes wrote:
> Let's all welcome Damian Kuras the way a translater should be
> welcomed :-)
Somebody please translate this to Polish?
Welcome to the team, Damian :)
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobil
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
>> yups polish conspiracy is growing...
> And most of it is under my control :P
Bwahahahahahaha ]:->
> Welcome Damian! :)
Welcome :)
--
Krzysiek 'Nelchael' Pawlik
GPG:0xBC51
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> Would you mind sharing the useflags you mean, and which packages you want
> to build? It might be bugs in the packages involved.
My standard USE flags for building a lamp server. No X, no cruft.
USE="-X -alsa -apm -arts -avi -cups -doc -eds -emboss -gnome -gpm -gstreamer
On Friday 27 January 2006 15:32, Jochen Maes wrote:
> yups polish conspiracy is growing...
And most of it is under my control :P
Okay okay, RESTRICT=lamejokes ...
Welcome Damian! :)
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, S
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> The ebuilds are not done in that way, the problem is portage's inability
> to handle this. There is no way ebuilds could solve this problem except
> not having the dependency. What is needed to solve it is merge perl
> without ssl support, merge openssl, merge perl with ssl
On Friday 27 January 2006 15:32, MIkey wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > First of all, the object to be as fast as possible has been dropped as
> > main gentoo goal years ago. Stage 3 is indeed based on an old base. It
> > however starts you with a working system in which all assumptions made by
>
yups polish conspiracy is growing...
Let's all welcome Damian Kuras the way a translater should be welcomed :-)
in his own words:
"My name is Damian Kuras, i'm 20 years old and i live in a small town on
south
east of Poland called Lezajsk where we have a pretty big brewery. I
study IT
and eco
On Friday 27 January 2006 14:42, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> it does ... but in case it cant find a fully qualified strip binary
> (CHOST-strip), it will fall back to plain old `strip`
Which it certainly can. As long as it doesn't look in /usr/lib/portage/bin to
find it. Something like:
STRIP="`wh
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> First of all, the object to be as fast as possible has been dropped as
> main gentoo goal years ago. Stage 3 is indeed based on an old base. It
> however starts you with a working system in which all assumptions made by
> ebuilds about the system are true. This means one sh
On Friday 27 January 2006 08:44, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2006 23:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > for those who dont know what i'm talking about, consider:
> > tail -1
> > head -1
> >
>
> it would seem i lied about this (at least the first two still work)
Still, the behavior of
On Monday 23 January 2006 23:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> for those who dont know what i'm talking about, consider:
> tail -1
> head -1
>
it would seem i lied about this (at least the first two still work)
the source code was refactored and i assumed this to mean they cut out the
backwards compa
On Friday 27 January 2006 03:17, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2006 19:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 January 2006 11:06, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > Sometimes when calling the strip option
> > > of install. A strip wrapper prevents this broken behaviour once and for
On Thursday 26 January 2006 17:17, MIkey wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > The "way around this" would be to change bootstrap.sh back to building a
> > minimal version of the current version that is then used to compile the
> > rest of the system, including the C library and gcc itself. Between th
On Thursday 26 January 2006 18:47, MIkey wrote:
> The stage3 install needs to be ditched for anything other than GRP or
> livecd installs, because face it, that is what it is. It consists of a
> generic system precompiled for desktop use. The toolchain is literally
> years behind most of the oth
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 16:55 -0600, MIkey wrote:
> Jan Kundrát wrote:
>
> > Those are bugs against the revdep-rebuild package.
>
> Which is one of the suggested methods to migrate gcc. Not necessary from
> stage1...
How does the listing of revdep-rebuild bugs have anything to do with
this topic?
On Thursday 26 January 2006 19:48, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2006 11:16, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 January 2006 16:34, Mikey wrote:
> > > And those instructions have nothing whatsoever to do with common sense
> > > from a new, or even experienced users perspectiv
On Thursday 26 January 2006 18:30, MIkey wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
> > Maybe you think fixing a circular dep is easy, I know I do. But when
> > Joe Shmoe think it's OMG U63r 1337 to install gentoo using a stage1
> > because it makes his system so awesomely fast ( hence, The Conrad
> > install on
On Thursday 26 January 2006 23:07, MIkey wrote:
> Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > Great, there was a bug. Yeah, there was. Please notice the word "was".
> > It means that it has been fixed and it isn't there anymore. So the
> > problem got fixed. It's over. Finito. Period. Why are you still talking
> > abou
On Thursday 26 January 2006 19:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2006 11:06, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 January 2006 14:51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Thursday 26 January 2006 05:43, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > > Another candidate would be the strip binary which m
31 matches
Mail list logo
