Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-02-02 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 01:55, Jason Stubbs wrote: However, if lang.desc already exists (and it does) and can be renamed to linguas.desc, it is probably a better way to manage it than use.desc. Yeah that would help. But in the mean time what should we do? If I commit something with

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-02-02 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:46:55 +0100 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Yeah that would help. But in the mean time what should we do? What you should always do. Do the right thing, even if repoman disagrees. Remember that repoman is there to try to help catch certain kinds of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Find apps not ported to modular X

2006-02-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
fixed by everyone else combined. Progress graph: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png Latest list: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060202 Herds with 10 or more unported packages, and change in # of packages

[gentoo-dev] Bugday reminder

2006-02-02 Thread Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alright everybody, it's time again to start breaking your systems and reporting bugs. It will be on next Saturday, 2006-02-04 :-) This time we would like people to try out some packages in ~arch and see how they run, so we can get them moved to

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Gérald Fenoy

2006-02-02 Thread Mike Doty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, please take a moment to welcome djay. Gérald is already a French GDP translator, and now will help out the sci herd with ebuild maintenance. In his own words, I've end my studies last year at the end of a master in computer-science at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Find apps not ported to modular X

2006-02-02 Thread Philip Webb
060202 Donnie Berkholz wrote: The last change: 406 to 343 -- nice! Progress graph: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png /spectate Today's graph seems itself broken, as it goes up slightly at the R end. Perhaps you could add numbers down the R-hand side

Re: [gentoo-dev] Find apps not ported to modular X

2006-02-02 Thread Jason Wever
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:39:15 -0800 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Latest list: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060202 Returns a 404 -- Jason Wever Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Gérald Fenoy

2006-02-02 Thread Olivier Fisette
Le Thursday, 2 February 2006 05:00 pm, Mike Doty a écrit : All, please take a moment to welcome djay. Gérald is already a French GDP translator, and now will help out the sci herd with ebuild maintenance. Glad to see you onboard. Welcome to the team! Cheers, -- Olivier Fisette (ribosome)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Find apps not ported to modular X

2006-02-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Jason Wever wrote: On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:39:15 -0800 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry guys, forgot to actually upload the data. =) Both problems should be fixed now. Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Find apps not ported to modular X

2006-02-02 Thread Marcelo Góes
Works for me. On 2/3/06, Jason Wever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:39:15 -0800 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Latest list: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060202 Returns a 404 -- Jason Wever Gentoo/Sparc

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge-webrsync patch

2006-02-02 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: Brian, I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :) InSVN, and in the tree... :) ~harring pgpcmhNYyu2R8.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-portage-dev] confcache, final chance to ixnay it

2006-02-02 Thread Brian Harring
Yo... attached is a patch enabling confcache support for portage. Lots of testing, plus fixups from comments from folks prior. So... giving it a few days, nows the time to bitch if you dislike the implementation (and no, I'm not rewriting all of doebuild just for this :) ~harring Index:

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge-webrsync patch

2006-02-02 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
Brian Harring wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: Brian, I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :) InSVN, and in the tree... :) Great! Thanks :) I was just wondering: Will I be mentioned anywhere? - Johannes. --

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge-webrsync patch

2006-02-02 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: Brian Harring wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: Brian, I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :) InSVN, and in the tree... :) Great! Thanks :)

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] confcache, final chance to ixnay it

2006-02-02 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Thursday 02 February 2006 21:12, Brian Harring wrote: Yo... attached is a patch enabling confcache support for portage. Lots of testing, plus fixups from comments from folks prior. So... giving it a few days, nows the time to bitch if you dislike the implementation (and no, I'm not

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge-webrsync patch

2006-02-02 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
Brian Harring wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: Brian Harring wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: Brian, I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :) InSVN, and in