On Saturday 01 July 2006 02:34, Alin Nastac wrote:
> I have a question for portage devs. Is appending -g to CFLAGS tolerable
> from your pov?
you're confusing things
adding debugging symbols has nothing to do with the stripping of a binary
the warning is because the binaries are stripped (`strip
well it's about that time of the year ... time for nominating people
for the next Gentoo Council
for the quick low down:
- nominations are from July 1 through July 31
- anyone can nominate
- only Gentoo devs may be nominated
so get with the nominating people !
for the full details, c
I have a question for portage devs. Is appending -g to CFLAGS tolerable
from your pov?
I ask this because net-dialup/freeradius allow me to install unstripped
binaries but the correspondent configure option (--enable-developer)
also append -g to CFLAGS.
Otherwise, I will have to patch configure.in
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:39:39 -0500
"Jory A. Pratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
> will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna
> cause some issues with stable tree I am aware of this. As packages
> break pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
>> As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
>> will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause
>> some issues with stable tr
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
> will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause
> some issues with stable tree I am aware of this. As packages break
> please reference bug http
As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause
some issues with stable tree I am aware of this. As packages break
please reference bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137665 If
you are able to pro
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 21:54 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
> arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
> mentoring him to full developership ;-).
>
> In the meantime, he's got his own alb
Congratulations! My best wishes for the newborn :)
On 6/30/06, Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
mentoring him to full developership ;-)
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
mentoring him to full developership ;-).
In the meantime, he's got his own album on
http://www.cs.ru.nl/~pauldv/tom/
Pau
Paul,
Congratulations! What did you and your wife name him? When exactly was
he born, etc?
Give us details!!
:)
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
> arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
> mentoring him to full developership ;-).
>
> In the meantime, he's got his own album on
> http://www.cs.ru.nl/~pauldv
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:28:41 -0400 Michael Cummings
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Congrats... So how does it feel to fork(); ? ;)
| >
|
| Silly, that's how you *make* the kid - he that about 30+ weeks ago...
I didn't know Paul ran HPPA.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: ciaran dot mccreesh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Congrats... So how does it feel to fork(); ? ;)
>
Silly, that's how you *make* the kid - he that about 30+ weeks ago...
- --
- -o()o--
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl D
On Friday 30 June 2006 23:06, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> (No, I didn't add evdev to non-Linux
> profiles, calm down =)
Oh you could have, I've masked the use-expanded useflag anyway ;)
But thanks for taking care :)
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt l
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed,
28 Jun 2006 17:16:35 -0400:
> After all, we're still "shipping" 1.2 ISO images under /historical, and I
> can guarantee you that the source code for all of this stuff isn't
> available from us.
>
> We will ne
Thomas Cort wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:28:30 -0700
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> - I'm offering to stable any interested arch for 7.1. PPC, SPARC and
>> MIPS have already taken me up on this. I will be starting this very soon
>> (within 2 hours at most), so respond ASAP if yo
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 09:54:47PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
> arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
> mentoring him to full developership ;-).
So, you have a new dev to *herd* n
Wernfried Haas wrote:
> earlier today i updated my box (without reading the guide because i
> haven't gotten this mail yet), and apart from one problem because of
> not deleting some files as mentioned in the guide, all went fine.
> I also noticed (and someone correct me if i'm wrong here) the smar
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:28:30 -0700
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - I'm offering to stable any interested arch for 7.1. PPC, SPARC and
> MIPS have already taken me up on this. I will be starting this very soon
> (within 2 hours at most), so respond ASAP if you would like to save
> you
"Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu,
29 Jun 2006 00:17:52 +0200:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:20:00 +0200
> Maurice van der Pot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 07:54:12PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
>> > You don't have to do
On Friday 30 June 2006 21:54, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom".
Congratulations Paul :)
Now you can join that club of old geezers :P
> ps. If I'm a bit away these days, it is due to me being preoccupied with my
> mentoring task.
Take
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
mentoring him to full developership ;-).
In the meantime, he's got his own album on
http://www.cs.ru.nl/~pauldv/tom/
Pau
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:14:01AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> 1. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/modular-x-howto.xml
earlier today i updated my box (without reading the guide because i
haven't gotten this mail yet), and apart from one problem because of
not deleting some files
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 21:54 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is
> "Tom". He
> arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care
> of
> mentoring him to full developership ;-).
Congratz!
--
Homer
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
> arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
> mentoring him to full developership ;-).
Congrats... So how does it feel to fork(); ? ;)
Jokey
signature.asc
Desc
Congratulations on your cloning efforts.
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 21:54 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
> arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
> mentoring him to full developership ;-).
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> - If you stable your own arch, please also keyword xev and luit in
> addition to the various deps of virtual/x11, xorg-x11 and xorg-server.
One other thing I forgot to mention -- stable xproto 7.0.5, not 7.0.7.
stable: libX11 1.0.1 = xproto 7.0.5
~arch: libX11 1.0.3 = xpr
I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
mentoring him to full developership ;-).
In the meantime, he's got his own album on
http://www.cs.ru.nl/~pauldv/tom/
Paul
ps. If I'm a bit awa
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I encourage other architectures to stabilize modular X. AMD64, you will
> want to go with 7.0 because you also have binary drivers. All other
> archs will want to go with 7.1. The modular X package list [2] will help
> with this.
- I'm offering to stable any interested arc
I've just spent the past few hours stabilizing modular X.Org 7.0 on x86.
This is a reminder of the migration guide [1] and a guide to other
arches on how to stabilize it. I have not stabilized most optional
packages, instead preferring to wait for any requests to see whether
demand exists for them.
31 matches
Mail list logo
