On Thursday 20 July 2006 21:17, Joshua Nichols wrote:
Could I get notice of whether or not your architecture is supporting
Java?
On PPC64 we have support for java in theory. In IBM JDK version 1.4 the Java
JIT compiler is broken, so pretty much everything is broken - except things
that are
On 7/19/06, Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion moving packages from one category to another just causes
unnecessary disruption to the tree - all relevant dependencies
throughout the tree have to be altered, putting current installations
out-of-date with respect to it.
Some
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 08:44:35AM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
In fact, categories do not give us the complete ability to have two
packages with the same upstream name in the tree ... because binary
packages do not support category names at all.
B.
They do actually- the bintree
Joshua Nichols wrote:
Doesn't support:
alpha
Alpha has compaq-{jdk,jre} which requires nast hacks with glibc and
doesn't work - details are in virtual/{jdk,jre} bugs.
--
Krzysiek Pawlik nelchael at gentoo.org key id: 0xBC51
desktop-misc, desktop-dock, desktop-wm, x86, java, apache...
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:10:42 +0200
Krzysiek Pawlik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Nichols wrote:
Doesn't support:
alpha
Alpha has compaq-{jdk,jre} which requires nast hacks with glibc and
doesn't work - details are in virtual/{jdk,jre} bugs.
compaq-{jdk,jre} were masked by YosWinK on July
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:10:51 -0400 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Every single year quarter after quarter the more updates
| that happen the slower portage is becoming.
| Care to solve that?
This is a minute amount of time in comparison to anything significant.
If you care about Portage
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:05:20 -0700 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Just so we're clear, I probably will wedgie anyone who suggests
| trying to extend the existing tree format with N categories per pkg-
| sounds nice on paper, but it makes lookup a serious pita-
| sys-apps/portage, we'll
On 7/6/06, Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So here's my nominations:
Flameeyes
brix
lu_zero
kosmikus
Stuart
jakub
marienz
patrick
Thanks, but I don't accept. I'm planning on leaving Gentoo.
Best regards,
Stu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi Mike,
On 7/21/06, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in Gentoo or in general ? in general, kaffe should support pretty much all
our arches, but in Gentoo, i dont have time to get it working for:
Last time I checked, kaffe didn't provide a libjvm, which is used for
embedding Java in
Brian,
I was looking through /usr/bin/emerge and lines 3477-3481 seemed to
best fit what displayConfirmPrompt is trying to supplement. The check
on line 3477 is against a No returned from userPrompt(), and then a
system exit code is issued by caller (line 3481).
Was unable to find any other
Simon Stelling wrote:
Hi all,
I just noticed that the USE flag 'firefox' is a local one. I think it should
be
global, though:
If this happens, could you also close
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96473 :)
--de.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I wouldn't know the first thing to do with Java, but jrocket-jdk-bin
has support for 1.4 and 1.5 on ia64.
Aron
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
