[gentoo-dev] Re: [Last Rites] dev-ruby/wxruby

2007-06-08 Thread Ryan Hill
Ryan Hill wrote: > # Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29 Apr 2007) > # Has a hard dependency on wxGTK-2.4 (bug #164148) > # Replacement: wxruby2 (bug #107682) > # Masked for removal May 29, 2007 > dev-ruby/wxruby > Removed. -- dirtyepic salesman said this vacuum's guaranteed g

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML

2007-06-08 Thread Kumba
Mike Doty wrote: George Prowse wrote: Kumba wrote: Kumba wrote: So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself and others (i.e., mcummi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML

2007-06-08 Thread Mike Doty
George Prowse wrote: > Kumba wrote: >> Kumba wrote: >>> >>> So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the >>> flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the >>> IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself >>> and others (i.e., mcu

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML

2007-06-08 Thread George Prowse
Kumba wrote: Kumba wrote: So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself and others (i.e., mcummings) to get back on track and actual

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML

2007-06-08 Thread Kumba
Kumba wrote: So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself and others (i.e., mcummings) to get back on track and actually like, you

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-06-08 Thread Michael Cummings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just want to say, you folks make me proud :) ok, off to shed a pathetic tear or something over this thread being revived. oh yeah. perl folks. let's get something together so these other shmoes don't steal all our thunder. - -- - -o()o---

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Non-Dev Contributors and the Tree

2007-06-08 Thread Elias Probst
On Friday 08 June 2007 09:01:54 Kent Fredric wrote: > As a non-dev with not a lot of free time, I applaud this suggestion. > However, my core fear is the potential for it becoming subject to > abuse, and people insisting on repeatedly uploading patches that are > not actually wanted / necessary for

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Non-Dev Contributors and the Tree

2007-06-08 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Steve Long wrote: > Dunno what the procedure might end up becoming, but my understanding is > commit right to the sunrise overlay, from where a dev has to commit it to > the main tree. It seems like a logical extension of sunrise, and i am sure > there are stats on who has submitted what to sunrise

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML

2007-06-08 Thread Luis Francisco Araujo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kumba wrote: > Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote: >> We might need some sort of enforcement for that particular purpose. >> While I think that "behavior" proctors are inappropriate, I think that >> people with ability to say "move this thread to gentoo-p

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Non-Dev Contributors and the Tree

2007-06-08 Thread Steve Long
Kent Fredric wrote: >> Comments? >> ~mcummings >> > As a non-dev with not a lot of free time, I applaud this suggestion. > However, my core fear is the potential for it becoming subject to > abuse, and people insisting on repeatedly uploading patches that are > not actually wanted / necessary for t

Re: [gentoo-dev] gnupg2 only vs gnupg-1 & gnupg-2

2007-06-08 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
Since no flames were started over something technical. Let me see if I can toss in some gasoline and get the bonfire going. On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 23:30 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > William L. Thomson Jr. napsal(a): > > This has sparked the following open bugs, and countless more closed > > ones :( >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gnupg2 only vs gnupg-1 & gnupg-2

2007-06-08 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 09:43 +0100, Steve Long wrote: > > > > > It works on stable systems, since gnupg is still slotted there: > >1.4.7-r1 in slot 0 > >1.9.21 in slot 1.9 > > > Er ok, but i'm guessing Mr Thomson wanted to have both available as separate > packages similar to those binary

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flag, xulrunner

2007-06-08 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raúl Porcel wrote: > Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> Raúl Porcel wrote: >>> Agreed from mozilla. >>> firefox and seamonkey already have the global use-flag >> Is there any guideline from mozilla team about what to do when there are >> more than one of these

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: phasing out app-accessibility/festival

2007-06-08 Thread Steve Long
William Hubbs wrote: > aoss > Alsa OSS (Open Sound System) interface (deprecated, aiui) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Living in a bubble [gentoo-proctor] Warning^2 (resend)

2007-06-08 Thread Mauricio Lima Pilla
Pardon me if you receive this message two times, I'm not sure it went to the ml the first time: On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:49:12PM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 14:08 -0300, Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote: > > Good luck for the remaining proctors, they will need as they aparen

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML

2007-06-08 Thread Steve Long
Duncan wrote: > Does mail/lists have anything like the followup-to header of news? > That'd be perfect for the "belongs in -project" posts, xpost the reminder > (with the quote, so the background is there for those /only/ on project/ > politics) to both, with followup-to set to -project. Of course

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML

2007-06-08 Thread Steve Long
Roman Zimmermann wrote: > Kumba wrote: >> >> what should we call it?  Vote on this! >> > If users have votes ... > Then I'd vote for gentoo-project. > > It seems to me that politics covers just a part of all possible > non-technical topics. Depends on how you define politics though. > ++ `politic

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flag, xulrunner

2007-06-08 Thread Raúl Porcel
Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Raúl Porcel wrote: >> Agreed from mozilla. > >> firefox and seamonkey already have the global use-flag > > Is there any guideline from mozilla team about what to do when there are > more than one of these flags (firefox/seamonkey/xulrunner) supported by > package AND enab

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-06-08 Thread Raúl Porcel
In mozilla herd: During the last month and during the first day of the month we did: -Stabilize mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.0 -Bump new versions fixing security bugs: -mozilla-firefox[-bin]-2.0.0.4 and 1.5.0.12, although we didn't put 1.5.0.12 on the tree as it is unsupported -mozilla-thunderbird

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-06-08 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I'd like to inform you about goings on in Scheme territory. BEGIN INTERMEZZO For those who've never heard of Scheme: Scheme is a modern minimal Lisp programming language. For those who ask themselves why on Earth people want to put up with

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gnupg2 only vs gnupg-1 & gnupg-2

2007-06-08 Thread Steve Long
Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007, Steve Long wrote: >>> Not to mention again, we are limiting choice, and forcing one or >>> the other. Which is not a complete solution, and makes our >>> offerings less than all other mainstream distros. > >> Good points. Imo, you should get some s

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML

2007-06-08 Thread Luca Barbato
Kumba wrote: > gentoo-politics > gentoo-circuits > gentoo-soap > gentoo-project > gentoo-gossip gentoo-drama - theatrical events every day, no feeling were hurt while filming the show* gentoo-chats - mindless discussions about non issues gentoo-rhetorics - exercise your language skills gentoo-p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML

2007-06-08 Thread Jeffrey Gardner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Because the trolls will continue to post here for the widest possible readership, it doesn't matter much what we call it... Add another vote for -project anyway :) - -- Jeffrey Gardner Gentoo Developer Public PGP Key ID: 4A5D8F23 hkp://pgpkeys.mit.ed

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: phasing out app-accessibility/festival

2007-06-08 Thread Jan Kundrát
William Hubbs wrote: > kismet Popular wireless analyzer. It has some functions for working with festival, although I haven't tried them yet. Cheers, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Non-Dev Contributors and the Tree

2007-06-08 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/7/07, Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ...or, Trees and Tree Climbers: Shaking up the tree Comments? ~mcummings As a non-dev with not a lot of free time, I applaud this suggestion. However, my core fear is the potential for i