Re: [gentoo-dev] GNU userland and binary package (WAS: RFC: sh versionator.eclass)

2007-10-10 Thread Roy Marples
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 20:03 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > > B. don't use GNU extensions in pkg_functions and have some way to export > > them (extract pkg_* functions from environment.bz2). Those can then be > > used by pre/post script in binary package manager. > > This is your best bet, but again

[gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming masking of dev-lang/php-4* and packages depending on it

2007-10-10 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:13:49 +0200 > Christian Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm going to p.mask =dev-lang/php-4* and all packages explicitly > > depending on this version of php (i.e. the whole dev-php4/ category > > (36 packages) and one webapp, www-a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming masking of dev-lang/php-4* and packages depending on it

2007-10-10 Thread Josh Saddler
Christian Hoffmann wrote: > Heya, > > I'm going to p.mask =dev-lang/php-4* and all packages explicitly > depending on this version of php (i.e. the whole dev-php4/ category > (36 packages) and one webapp, www-apps/knowledgetree, bug 194894 [1]) > next weekend (around Oct 14th). This step is necess

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming masking of dev-lang/php-4* and packages depending on it

2007-10-10 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:13:49 +0200 Christian Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heya, > > I'm going to p.mask =dev-lang/php-4* and all packages explicitly > depending on this version of php (i.e. the whole dev-php4/ category > (36 packages) and one webapp, www-apps/knowledgetree, bug 194894 [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNU userland and binary package (WAS: RFC: sh versionator.eclass)

2007-10-10 Thread Alec Warner
On 10/8/07, Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 06:52 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > > On 10/8/07, Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: > > > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > > Fabian has summed it up nicely,

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/pygtksourceview: metadata.xml pygtksourceview-2.0.0.ebuild Manifest ChangeLog

2007-10-10 Thread Rémi Cardona
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > I think the python_mod_ functions take care of running python_version() > ... also have you noticed that you're optimizing in postrm instead of > cleaning up? I just copied the ebuild from our overlay to portage. I think this ebuild is quite similar to other gnome/pytho

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/pygtksourceview: metadata.xml pygtksourceview-2.0.0.ebuild Manifest ChangeLog

2007-10-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 21:22 Wed 10 Oct , Remi Cardona (remi) wrote: > 1.1 dev-python/pygtksourceview/pygtksourceview-2.0.0.ebuild > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-python/pygtksourceview/pygtksourceview-2.0.0.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.g

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-misc/gfontview

2007-10-10 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Hi, app-misc/gfontview depends on the phasing out gtk+-1.2 and has an open issue and is unmaintained upstream: Bug 189775 app-misc/gfontview-0.5.0-r6 segfaults on startup # Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10 Oct 2007) # removal because of starting problems in Bug 189775, gtk+-1.2 usage # l

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use

2007-10-10 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Denis Dupeyron wrote: > On 10/10/07, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Eventually I'd like to add an option that >> behaves similar to --resume but also recalculates dependencies. > > Why not make that the default ? That would be safer IMO. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 07:55 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote: > Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > On T, 2007-10-09 at 21:03 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote: > >> The little lame use flag has started showing up more in local use flags, > >> and all for the same purpose, MP3 support using LAME libraries. I vote > >> we mov

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use

2007-10-10 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On 10/10/07, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eventually I'd like to add an option that > behaves similar to --resume but also recalculates dependencies. Why not make that the default ? That would be safer IMO. Plus, once we have this, it looks to me that nobody has to wait for EAPI=1 in o

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gnatbuild.eclass

2007-10-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 18:17 Wed 10 Oct , George Shapovalov (george) wrote: > george 07/10/10 18:17:58 > > Modified: gnatbuild.eclass > > Log: fixed src_install issue, no longer relies on portage leaking > env vars between functions It's really sad that you have to add this workaround. Thanks, Donni

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use

2007-10-10 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marius Mauch wrote: > On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:16:03 +0200 > "Denis Dupeyron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 10/10/07, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I think it's OK to start using package.use now considering that >>> package.use has been

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-editors/pico

2007-10-10 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, # Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10 Oct 2007) # masked for removal, just useless because # it does not install anything, see bug 3464 app-editors/pico -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode http://www.faulhammer

[gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-10 Thread Duncan
Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600: > The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than > one mp3 encoder. In almost every case of the use flag being applied > above, there is already support for anoth

Re: [gentoo-dev] integrating solaris overlay into main portage

2007-10-10 Thread Fabian Groffen
Hi Christian, On 10-10-2007 17:31:17 +0200, Christian Parpart wrote: ... > However, knowing that portage for Solaris (10) is only available via a prefix > is not the problem, but knowing that for solaris you have to use a completely > different portage tree which is just lagging behind is a real

[gentoo-dev] integrating solaris overlay into main portage

2007-10-10 Thread Christian Parpart
Hi all, i always feared in asking this because of some typical flamewars, however. I am now in a company which is actively using Solaris 10 and Gentoo. We're deploying some house-written software onto both using the portage system (!). However, knowing that portage for Solaris (10) is only avai

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/planet

2007-10-10 Thread Steve Dibb
Dawid Węgliński wrote: Dnia 09-10-2007, wto o godzinie 20:56 -0600, Steve Dibb napisał(a): # Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (11 Aug 2007) # Old, unmaintained, pending removal www-client/planet punted Anything to use instead? Well, anyone can ressurect the ebuild if they want. Besides, the

Re: [gentoo-dev] lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-10 Thread Steve Dibb
Mart Raudsepp wrote: On T, 2007-10-09 at 21:03 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote: The little lame use flag has started showing up more in local use flags, and all for the same purpose, MP3 support using LAME libraries. I vote we move it into a global use flag. Any objections, let me know. $ quse -D l

Re: [gentoo-dev] lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-10 Thread Petteri Räty
George Shapovalov kirjoitti: > Wednesday, 10. October 2007, Steve Dibb Ви написали: >> The little lame use flag has started showing up more in local use flags, >> and all for the same purpose, MP3 support using LAME libraries. I vote >> we move it into a global use flag. Any objections, let me kn

[gentoo-dev] Re: new-style virtual/editor

2007-10-10 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > about 26 ebuilds have a PROVIDE=virtual/editor. Those could be > transformed to a new-style virtual, which is really simple. According > to zmedico and genone the impact of just commiting the virtual would > be low. But I'd like to hear some comments o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular texlive eclasses up for review

2007-10-10 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:49:05 +0200 Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roy Marples ha scritto: > > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 13:17 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > >>> if [ "${f/config/}" != "${f}" ] > >>> Should be > >>> if [ "${f#*config*}" != "${f}" ] > >>> > Should be > > if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-video/vlc: ChangeLog vlc-0.9.0_alpha20071009.ebuild

2007-10-10 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 16:28:23 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > if use nsplugin; then > > if use seamonkey; then > > XPIDL=/usr/lib/seamonkey > > MOZILLA_CONFIG=/usr/lib/seamonkey/seamonkey-config > > else > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/planet

2007-10-10 Thread Dawid Węgliński
Dnia 09-10-2007, wto o godzinie 20:56 -0600, Steve Dibb napisał(a): > # Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (11 Aug 2007) > # Old, unmaintained, pending removal > www-client/planet > > punted Anything to use instead? Cheers -- ,-. | Dawid Węgliński | | [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use

2007-10-10 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:16:03 +0200 "Denis Dupeyron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/10/07, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think it's OK to start using package.use now considering that > > package.use has been supported since portage-2.1.2 and that's been > > stable since February.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use

2007-10-10 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Denis Dupeyron wrote: > On 10/10/07, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think it's OK to start using package.use now considering that >> package.use has been supported since portage-2.1.2 and that's been >> stable since February. There are alre

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Arch Testing Tool

2007-10-10 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, all arch devs interested in above tool (app-portage/gatt-svn), I wrote a little introduction for it. See Planet. V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode http://www.faulhammer.org/> signature.asc Description: PGP si

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use

2007-10-10 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On 10/10/07, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's OK to start using package.use now considering that > package.use has been supported since portage-2.1.2 and that's been > stable since February. There are already a couple of packages using > it in the tree now. Is it a good idea fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-10 Thread George Shapovalov
Wednesday, 10. October 2007, Steve Dibb Ви написали: > The little lame use flag has started showing up more in local use flags, > and all for the same purpose, MP3 support using LAME libraries. I vote > we move it into a global use flag. Any objections, let me know. Are these cases lame specific

Re: [gentoo-dev] lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-10 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On T, 2007-10-09 at 21:03 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote: > The little lame use flag has started showing up more in local use flags, > and all for the same purpose, MP3 support using LAME libraries. I vote > we move it into a global use flag. Any objections, let me know. > > $ quse -D lame > local:

[gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for October

2007-10-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC). If you're supposed to show up, please show up. If you're not supposed to show up, then show up a