On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:45:49 +0200
Markus Rothe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello fellow developers,
>
> I have a problem with repoman.
You have a problem with your scripts. I must admit that in keywording
for hppa I do use bash aliases and scripts as helpers but nothing too
fancy, let alone au
On Saturday 20 October 2007 20:47:16 Zac Medico wrote:
> Markus Rothe wrote:
> > So if I want to mark for example sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 stable on ppc64 I
> > call mp.sh like this: mp.sh ppc64 sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 "Stable on ppc64"
>
> If that mp.sh script fails then you have keyworded an ebuild but it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Rothe wrote:
> So if I want to mark for example sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 stable on ppc64 I call
> mp.sh like this: mp.sh ppc64 sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 "Stable on ppc64"
If that mp.sh script fails then you have keyworded an ebuild but it
hasn't been com
>> In an ebuild, i'd like to specify an "download as"-filename. That means,
>> out there, there is a file called "http://host/myprogram-1.2.3/patch01";
>> which i'd like to download as "myprogram-1.2.3-patch01".
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177863
>
> We're planning to support that
Hi!
A while ago Renat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) provided virtuals for packages that
depend on a web server. Currently many of the web applications
depended on Apache or don't pull in a web server at all which is of
course problematic.
The corresponding bug:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1100
Hello fellow developers,
I have a problem with repoman. I keep breaking the dependency tree. Jabub
knows what I'm talking about. Latest examples are bugs #196470, #196472 and
#196474. On a side note I actually don't want to break the dependency tree...
Attached are the scripts I use to commit p
