William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/java/getting-involved.xml
>
Maybe could we get it moved on the top level?
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
I'm thinking of adding both the bluetooth and usb USE flags to the
2008.0 profiles for amd64/x86. I'll be adding just usb for everybody
else, unless they want bluetooth, also.
So why am I asking about this?
Well, I'm wanting to add it to the "2008.0" profiles, not the "desktop"
or "server" sub-p
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 23:47 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
> >
> > base/packages:
> > removed debianutils
>
> I don't think we reached a decision on whether debianutils should go to
> kernel-2.eclass before this is done.
Actually, it isn't very important if it happens
Duncan wrote:
A GWN or similar announcement before it moves beyond the dev profiles
would be nice, but if the affected devs (incl. bugwranglers) are willing
to deal with the complaints and they seem to be, the leaner system and
image is IMO a good thing, and announcement or not, people really
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 01 Feb
2008 17:05:18 -0500:
> On Friday 01 February 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
>> > base/packages:
>> > removed debianutils
>>
>> I don't think we reached a decision on whether debi
On Feb 1, 2008 11:34 PM, Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> IIRC it was because you argued that cvs didn't qualify
> as a VCS (as the proposed category name back then was app-vcs)
>
I dont see why cvs is not a vcs like the others but ok.
But I'm all in for a dev-scm (or similar) catego
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:57:39 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:16 -0500 (EST)
> "Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems like all source control/revision control programs live in
> > dev-util, but they might be better served in something like
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
base/packages:
removed debianutils
I don't think we reached a decision on whether debianutils should go to
kernel-2.eclass before this is done.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Friday 01 February 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
> > base/packages:
> > removed debianutils
>
> I don't think we reached a decision on whether debianutils should go to
> kernel-2.eclass before this is done.
i think the answer is no
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Th
Caleb Tennis a écrit :
Any objections to this potential move, or comments on a better category name?
No objections. Just wondering about tools like gitweb, will they stay in
web-apps?
Rémi
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 19:59 +0100, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> GLEP46, as discussed on Januar 21-24.
> I'd say it's ready. The only minor thing is where to keep the list of
> available tags. As far as I understood neysx we should keep it in
> metadata.dtd itself.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/gle
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply r
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:16 -0500 (EST)
"Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems like all source control/revision control programs live in
> dev-util, but they might be better served in something like dev-scm
> or something like that. I'm thinking things like darcs, git, cvs,
> svn, me
Hi,
It seems like all source control/revision control programs live in dev-util, but
they might be better served in something like dev-scm or something like that.
I'm
thinking things like darcs, git, cvs, svn, mercurial, bzr. Then the slew of
packages that depend on them: gitosis, bzrtools.
An
OK, so I built a complete set of stages (with no circular dependencies!)
on amd64 for testing, using both the "default-linux/amd64/dev/2008.0"
and the "default-linux/amd64/dev/2008.0/desktop" profiles with the
following changes and everything worked perfectly. I would like to
replicate this to the
On Friday 01 February 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 January 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> > > > 080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > now that the mktemp binary has
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 31 January 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> > > 080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils
> > > > and integrated stra
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
On 14/01/2008, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:49:02PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Software, I picked up maintenance of autofs when the previous maintainer
> > went
> > AWOL several years ago, and ran with it because I needed AutoFS-LDAP. I
> > don'
19 matches
Mail list logo
