Re: [gentoo-dev] public system of ratings

2008-02-16 Thread Rémi Cardona
Oleg Puchinin a écrit : Day kind! I recently have started to use Gentoo, and I had one question. What for to charge developers of a problem of check of packages? Why to not make public system of ratings? For example voting We already have such a implicit rating system :) It's called bugzilla.

[gentoo-dev] public system of ratings

2008-02-16 Thread Oleg Puchinin
Day kind! I recently have started to use Gentoo, and I had one question. What for to charge developers of a problem of check of packages? Why to not make public system of ratings? For example voting " is not compiled At all " "works" ... "It is excellent" "I wish to see a package in Gentoo " And

Re: [gentoo-dev] public system of ratings

2008-02-16 Thread Oleg Puchinin
One hundred programmers which only also do that dig in mountain "bugs" a kind " new package ", it, in my opinion, how to use a steam hammer to crack nuts. Can it is necessary to make the processes occuring in Gentoo by more public? On Feb 16, 2008 3:06 PM, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] public system of ratings

2008-02-16 Thread Daniel Black
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:49:09 pm Oleg Puchinin wrote: > Day kind! > I recently have started to use Gentoo, and I had one question. I counted two. > What for to charge developers of a problem of check of packages? I don't know what this means. > Why to not make public system of ratings? There ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] public system of ratings

2008-02-16 Thread Torsten Rehn
On Saturday 16 February 2008, Oleg Puchinin wrote: > " is not compiled At all " > "works" All stable ebuilds in the tree should work, if they don't that's an exception and will probably get fixed soon after the failure is discovered anyway. Anyone who is willing to test a new keyword in an ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] public system of ratings

2008-02-16 Thread Peter Volkov
Oleg, please, do not top post. В Сбт, 16/02/2008 в 15:16 +0600, Oleg Puchinin пишет: > One hundred programmers which only also do that dig in mountain "bugs" > a kind " new package ", it, in my opinion, how to use a steam hammer > to crack nuts. Can it is necessary to make the processes occuring i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/cacti: ChangeLog metadata.xml cacti-0.8.7a-r2.ebuild cacti-0.8.6j-r8.ebuild cacti-0.8.7b.ebuild cacti-0.8.7a-r1.ebuild cacti-0.8

2008-02-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 14/02/2008 в 23:19 -0800, Donnie Berkholz пишет: > > use bundled-adodb || phpUseFlags="${phpUseFlags} sockets" > > Why is bundling even an option? We should always force external packages > to be used, or we end up with more zlib messes. This does no harm and can help in situations w

[gentoo-dev] virtual/pager

2008-02-16 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, going from bug 209624 [1], I created a virtual/pager-0.ebuild file, which transfers the old-style to a new-style virtual. Have I forgotten a pager? Is there anyone in opposition to it? V-Li [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209624> -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project ht

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/cacti: ChangeLog metadata.xml cacti-0.8.7a-r2.ebuild cacti-0.8.6j-r8.ebuild cacti-0.8.7b.ebuild cacti-0.8.7a-r1.ebuild cacti-0.8

2008-02-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:25:43 +0300 Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This does no harm and can help in situations when web-app upstream > modified bundled adodb in non compatible way. But well, I'll drop it > from USE flags and define environmental variable inside ebuild to show > that alth

Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/pager

2008-02-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:34:29 +0100 Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > going from bug 209624 [1], I created a virtual/pager-0.ebuild file, > which transfers the old-style to a new-style virtual. Have I > forgotten a pager? Is there anyone in opposition to it? Is there any point to

[gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/pager

2008-02-16 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > going from bug 209624 [1], I created a virtual/pager-0.ebuild file, > which transfers the old-style to a new-style virtual. Have I > forgotten a pager? Is there anyone in opposition to it? And now I really append the ebuild. V-Li -- Christian

[gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/pager

2008-02-16 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:34:29 +0100 > Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > going from bug 209624 [1], I created a virtual/pager-0.ebuild file, > > which transfers the old-style to a new-style virtual. Have I > > forgotten a pager? Is ther

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo at PyCon 2008 in Chicago

2008-02-16 Thread Matthew Summers
Greetings Gentoo Devs, I'm writing to let everyone know about a Gentoo Birds of a Feather at PyCon 2008 in Chicago. We have room Love Int'l A scheduled for Saturday, March 15, from 6PM to (PM (or later). Please post to this forum if you have a moment, and you are planning on attending PyCon. http

[gentoo-dev] New developer: Ben de Groot (yngwin)

2008-02-16 Thread Petteri Räty
Another slacker to join the ranks. Took 8 months for him to get the quizes done and reviewed but finally there. He will be working on multimedia ebuilds. Ben hails from Arnemuiden, NL. He should be a familiar nick for many from our IRC channels. As a tip to all of our female readers out there,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/cacti: ChangeLog metadata.xml cacti-0.8.7a-r2.ebuild cacti-0.8.6j-r8.ebuild cacti-0.8.7b.ebuild cacti-0.8.7a-r1.ebuild cacti-0.8

2008-02-16 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 15:25 Sat 16 Feb , Peter Volkov wrote: > В Чтв, 14/02/2008 в 23:19 -0800, Donnie Berkholz пишет: > > > use bundled-adodb || phpUseFlags="${phpUseFlags} sockets" > > > > Why is bundling even an option? We should always force external packages > > to be used, or we end up with more zlib m