On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:17:27 -0700
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think I understand the difference between the effects of
> these two options.
cat/a-1 is installed and has RDEPEND cat/b
cat/a-2 is to be installed and has DEPEND cat/b and RDEPEND =cat/b-2
cat/b-1 is installed
On 06:33 Sat 19 Apr , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:27:21 -0700
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My interpretation is pkg_* counts as runtime (I can imagine a package
> > wanting to run itself at this point), so packages in RDEPEND should
> > be usable at that
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:06:07 +0200
Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say we should convert it to a global use flag now with a good
> description and change it to gnome-keyring later in case we really
> have a package which needs 'keyring' for something else.
Needless to say it would
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-04-20 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
sys-fs/cryptsetup-luks 2008-04-14 18:58:17 cardoe
dev-scheme/mit-scheme 2008-04-14 21:19:26 hkbst
dev-lisp/gcl-cvs200
Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) Nice and simple. Just force all packages to compile with
> --gnome-keyring
*cough* pambase *cough*
So discard this idea already, removing the flag is not an
option... unless you want pambase to stick with gnome USE flag as I did
in or
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 19:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le dimanche 20 avril 2008 à 20:25 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
> > On 4/20/08, Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > for what it's worth, as a gnome dev I didn't see any convincing
> > > arguments as to why it shou
Hi there
What do you think of putting edac and ipmi stuff (and maybe other
server-related monitoring/controlling stuff) into the sysadmin herd?
Alternative: Create a new herd (name?) for such tools.
Cheers,
Tiziano
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Le dimanche 20 avril 2008 à 20:25 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
> On 4/20/08, Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > for what it's worth, as a gnome dev I didn't see any convincing
> > arguments as to why it should be renamed. Gnome makes things optional
> > for other to reuse (like
On 4/20/08, Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for what it's worth, as a gnome dev I didn't see any convincing
> arguments as to why it should be renamed. Gnome makes things optional
> for other to reuse (like xfce) but afaik no other "keyring" like
> programs are optional deps o
Le dimanche 20 avril 2008 à 15:45 +0100, Peter Weller a écrit :
> Unless anyone has any objections, I'll magically turn 'keyring' into a
> global USE flag tomorrow evening:
for what it's worth, as a gnome dev I didn't see any convincing
arguments as to why it should be renamed. Gnome makes things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
| If we know there may be a future problem, why make the next *VALID*
| addition perform extra work?
I think the reasoning is that whilst there may be a future problem,
there currently isn't. If it gets changed to gnome-keyring,
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:06 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> >
> > I'd say we should convert it to a global use flag now with a good
> > description and change it to gnome-keyring later in case we really have a
> > package
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:06 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> > 2008/4/20 Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:32 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> >> > Alon Bar-Lev yazm??:
> >> > > I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
> >> >
> >> > How about
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say we should convert it to a global use flag now with a good
> description and change it to gnome-keyring later in case we really have a
> package which needs 'keyring' for something else.
If we know there may be a f
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> 2008/4/20 Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:32 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
>> > Alon Bar-Lev yazm??:
>> > > I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
>> >
>> > How about gnome-keyring? :)
>> >
>>
>> Why? All the ebuilds currently using the 'k
2008/4/20 Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:32 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> > Alon Bar-Lev yazmış:
> > > I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
> >
> > How about gnome-keyring? :)
> >
>
> Why? All the ebuilds currently using the 'keyring' use flag are using it
>
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:32 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev yazmış:
> > I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
>
> How about gnome-keyring? :)
>
Why? All the ebuilds currently using the 'keyring' use flag are using it
for gnome-keyring. As long as there is a proper descriptio
Alon Bar-Lev yazmış:
> I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
How about gnome-keyring? :)
--
Regards,
Ali Polatel
pgpo12m9JUCL3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
2008-04-20 16:45:43 Peter Weller napisał(a):
> Unless anyone has any objections, I'll magically turn 'keyring' into a
> global USE flag tomorrow evening:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/gentoo/cvs/gentoo-x86/profiles $ grep ':keyring'
> use.local.desc
> app-crypt/seahorse:keyring - Enable gnome-keyring su
This may be confusing with Linux key store.
I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
Alon
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless anyone has any objections, I'll magically turn 'keyring' into a
> global USE flag tomorrow evening:
>
> [EMAIL PROTE
Unless anyone has any objections, I'll magically turn 'keyring' into a
global USE flag tomorrow evening:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/gentoo/cvs/gentoo-x86/profiles $ grep ':keyring'
use.local.desc
app-crypt/seahorse:keyring - Enable gnome-keyring support for storing
passwords
app-text/evince:keyring - Ena
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:29:10 -0700
> Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Stop name dropping labels until you tell folk about what labels are.
> > I know, but I'd rather not have the notion "labels solves al
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:29:10 -0700
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not all cycles are solvable w/in the domain of execution which is an
> unfortunate fact. This loops back into why jstubbs was after use dep
> cycle breaking (fair bit more fine grained of an issue), a discussion
> tha
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:57:28AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:38:06 +0200
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know what the general use of pkg_preinst is, but in
> > pkg_postinst the package itself should be runnable, so its RDEPENDS
> > sh
24 matches
Mail list logo
