On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:22:21PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> INSANITY!
>
>
> You'll fit right in. Welcome.
The voices in my head tell my to say "Welcome Markus" :-]
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org
forum-mods (
Hi,
I added the Gentoo project to Hackontest (for more information, visit http://hackontest.org/)
. Developers and users are invited to add feature requests for Gentoo
(preferably with links to bugzilla :-)). Hopefully, some of us
developers can get together and implement them at the Hackont
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:27:18 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In bug #218288, it was brought to our attention that
> media-fonts/sharefonts, which has been in our tree under a
> public-domain LICENSE, is anything but. Each of the fonts in this
> collection is released under a variety
On 2008-05-01 03:20, Duft Markus wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just read the mail-archive and (i'm not at work), and felt that I have
> to say something about the binary packages on windows ;) (so sorry for
> what the outlook web-access thingy does to emails and threads :))
Have you seen this?:
http://home.in
* Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272
According to this bug, portage still can't handle use-deps,
there's just a standard way for breaking the build on missing
useflags.
Exactly what I already suspected.
cu
--
---
On Thu, 1 May 2008 18:23:28 +0200
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But that discussion can come after Portage gets use dependencies...
> > Which, as I understand it, won't be for at least another eighteen
> > months because three more people have just asked for them.
>
> I'm a bit con
* Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Not really. For packages that support it, it just means adding a way
> for that package to be told to do a partial rebuild for the addition of
> a use flag.
Ugh, partial rebuilds are alway tricky and tend to make things
even more complicated and er
On Thu, 01 May 2008 19:05:35 +0300
Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It still means a rebuild of the binding providing library, which
> involves unnecessary recompilation of the (typically) C or C++
> library, which in some cases can be a huge time sink - that in the
> case that the librar
On N, 2008-05-01 at 17:52 +0200, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > while building yum, I again ran into trouble because one
> > dependency has to be rebuilt with an specific useflag first
> > (in this ca
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> while building yum, I again ran into trouble because one
> dependency has to be rebuilt with an specific useflag first
> (in this case it was libxml2 + python useflag). Actually,
> there are *lots* of t
Ever heard of use dependencies? Way you are proposing this is just
more work and no solutions to real problems.
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> while building yum, I again ran into trouble because one
> dependency has to be rebuilt wit
* Santiago M. Mola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
This is totally offtopic here. The issue has been discussed
excessively on the forum (10 pages!). And this issue is *only*
relevant to the f.g.o platform, not the Gentoo project at all,
especially NOT the technically development.
BTW: if I was fo
On N, 2008-05-01 at 05:30 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
>
Hi folks,
while building yum, I again ran into trouble because one
dependency has to be rebuilt with an specific useflag first
(in this case it was libxml2 + python useflag). Actually,
there are *lots* of these cases and (AFAIK) portage has no
way for properly handling this - it's up to the
(I'll Try again, from correct email address)
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 05:30 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have somethin
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 07:34:51AM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > All in all I guess we need to make the rules up as we go and decide
> > policy later. I suggest the first herd/address in the list should be
> > the primary contact. If you don't agree with that, please cons
Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Beside, I'm asking myself how to handle this situation. Hard-enable them all
> as long as there are no patches? Let the automagic go in the tree? Opinions
> welcome.
Automagic has _not_ to come to the tree, so hard-enable them all is the
way.
Have you lo
Hi!
Just read the mail-archive and (im not at work), and felt that I have to say
something about the binary packages on windows ;) (so sorry for what the
outlook web-access thingy does to emails and threads :))
Right now we start using Gentoo Prefix as the primary development environment
at o
Hi,
Recently, GIMP got it's first development version based on gegl.
Now, gegl has 13 optional dependencies that could be use-flagged. The pity is,
it has no configure-option for most of them, they are autodetected.
(It's about gtk, ruby, lua, cairo, pango, libpng, openexr, rsvg, sdl,
asciidoc,
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> All in all I guess we need to make the rules up as we go and decide
> policy later. I suggest the first herd/address in the list should be
> the primary contact. If you don't agree with that, please consult
> metadata.xml for the package or reassign to bug-wranglers with an
21 matches
Mail list logo
