Zac Medico wrote:
It's common for people get get confused like this by the confmem
behavior that's built into portage's merge process. You can use
--noconfmem to disable it.
Ah, I didn't knew we had this option, thanks for the info. However, a
user complained in [1] that net-dialup/ppp failed
Robert Bridge wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:30:20 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO it would be better to teach users to explicitly specify
'@system' during updates, e.g. `emerge -uDN @system @world`.
Why not just re-instate the implicit dependency
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Markus Rothe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Bridge wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:30:20 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO it would be better to teach users to explicitly specify
'@system' during updates, e.g. `emerge
Richard Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:34:53 -0400:
Personally, I use -Os across the board when it doesn't break. As you
said I tend to be memory/IO bound, and optimizing for size helps with
both (swapping causes IO). I'd probably
Ryan Hill wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:55:00 +
Raul Porcel (armin76) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
armin76 08/07/18 17:55:00
Modified: mozcoreconf-2.eclass
Log:
Enable by default mozilla's optimization
+IUSE=${IUSE} custom-optimization
+
Could you use custom-cflags
Duncan wrote:
Has anyone done a study of -Os vs -O2 with gcc-4.3.x,
Just a quick note while on the subject : -Os is known to break some
packages.
Although it has been a while since I've last had a full -Os system,
there was a time when -Os was a _very_bad_idea_. That's why the Gnome
Herd
Cold you please fix your reply?
--
Michael Hammer|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Graz, AT
Gentoo Developer (Kerberos) | http://www.michael-hammer.at
pgpDY8QTPhvzj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Well, it looks like we're not alone on this project. This email was just sent
to me:
Adam,
I managed to track down someone who can probably help you with your ICC work,
if you're nice to him. :)
See the forwarded message:
Have your friend contact bill dot hilliard at intel dot com. He's on
Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using
developer profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for software
developers and don't see that it's for Gentoo developers and not
intended for end users. They know the Developer installation profiles
of other distros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:39:04 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using
developer profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for software
developers and don't see
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using
developer profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for software
developers and don't see that it's for Gentoo developers and not
intended for end users. They know the Developer installation
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Some kind of warning or other mechanism that does selecting this profile
without knowing what you're doing would be a good idea.
This isn't enough?
%% grep KNOW *
make.defaults:I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING=yes
;)
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Some kind of warning or other mechanism that does selecting this
profile without knowing what you're doing would be a good idea.
This isn't enough?
%% grep KNOW *
make.defaults:I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING=yes
;)
Nobody ever reads
On 16:34 Sat 19 Jul , Josh Saddler wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using
developer profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for
software developers and don't see that it's for Gentoo developers and
not intended for
14 matches
Mail list logo
