On Monday 15 December 2008 05:47:47 pm Duncan wrote:
Paul Varner fuzzy...@gentoo.org posted
1229371818.21630.7.ca...@txslpc1d36.wkst.vzwnet.com, excerpted below, on
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:10:17 -0600:
# Paul Varner fuzzy...@gentoo.org (14 Dec 2008) # Dead upstream,
masked for removal in ~30
2008/12/16 Robert R. Russell nahoy_kb...@hushmail.com:
Does anyone have a substitute for udept's clean word file and
clean /etc/portage options?
With clean world file you mean dep -w or dep --pruneworld and this
is what we are already discussing here.
eix-test-obsolete is quite usable as
2008/12/16 Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net:
FWIW, that's why I originally merged udept. However, by that time I had
gotten used to using a set of (local) stub scripts that added in all the
appropriate switches, including --oneshot, so once I used udept to clean
up the mess I had created before
Hello.
Some time ago I've modified stardict.eclass and added optional
possibility based on 'gzip' USE flag to compress index and dict data
files. But I realized too late that I need to document this USE flag
somewhere, and since it'll do similar things for all stardict-*
dictionaries (heh, more
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:21:16 +0300
Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote:
Some time ago I've modified stardict.eclass and added optional
possibility based on 'gzip' USE flag to compress index and dict data
files. But I realized too late that I need to document this USE flag
somewhere, and since
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:21:16 +0300
Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote:
Some time ago I've modified stardict.eclass and added optional
possibility based on 'gzip' USE flag to compress index and dict data
files. But I realized too late that I need to document this USE
В Втр, 16/12/2008 в 19:27 +, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
What's the point of having this as an option at all? Is it really
something that affects the end user in any way?
The reason is that this feature requires additional dependency on
app-text/dictd package (to compress dictionary data dictzip
Exhibit A:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/python.eclass?r1=1.48r2=1.49
This causes me pain on my hosts that don't have =bash-3.1[0] for
/bin/bash. Because I can't install portage with an old bash until I
get a new python installed which uses python.eclass which isn't
