Long time ago [1] it was decided that category net-www should be
retired, since the www-* categories exist for these packages.
However, if I look at the category, then most packages in it were
created in 2006 or later. In my understanding, at least no new
packages should be created in net-www.
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Another question is if the existing ones should still be moved to
some www-* category?
Should? I have no idea. Where exactly would we move these packages?
The quasi-more-usefully-named www-misc?
Though I seriously have no objection to either keeping
Hello all,
In the Gentoo Prefix project we have a special USE flag: 'prefix',
kind of like $ARCH USE flags. I am writing here to ask of the best way
to introduce a global implicit USE flag to gentoo-x86. There has been
some interest from other devs to kill diffs in ebuilds between
gentoo-x86 and
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Jim Ramsay wrote:
Another question is if the existing ones should still be moved to
some www-* category?
Should? I have no idea. Where exactly would we move these packages?
The quasi-more-usefully-named www-misc?
Yes, if none of the other www-* categories fits.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
So, my recommendation is to:
1) mask the prefix USE flag in base/use.mask because no one except the
prefix profiles should use this flag.
2) unmask and force the USE flag in prefix profile.
3) add entry to use.desc.
addendum)
Hi,
please see attached news item for review.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/
Title: Migration to X.org Server 1.5
Author: Remi Cardona r...@gentoo.org
Author: Christian
Le 04/04/2009 00:01, Christian Faulhammer a écrit :
please see attached news item for review.
The wording is fine.
Signed-off-by: Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org
Thanks
Ulrich Mueller demis ki::
# Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org (2 Apr 2009)
# De-supported by upstream since three years, see http://tug.org/teTeX/
# Please use app-text/texlive as a replacement. A migration guide is at
# http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml
# Package has
Hi,
Ferris McCormick fmc...@gentoo.org:
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 19:21 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi everyone,
with EAPI 3 confusion about what is in which EAPI may increase,
although appendix E of the PMS is quite helpful here. Anyway,
something handy to put on your desk is my
Hi,
Gokdeniz Karadag gokde...@ceng.metu.edu.tr:
Ulrich Mueller demis ki::
# Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org (2 Apr 2009)
# De-supported by upstream since three years, see
http://tug.org/teTeX/ # Please use app-text/texlive as a
replacement. A migration guide is at #
Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org writes:
please review attached news item.
Title: Migration to X.org Server 1.5
Clearly wrong.
Posted: 2009-04-06
Given that I'm currently dealing with the repercussions of not having
seen the migration guide until it failed mid-way through the emerge,
Hi
First there is a typo;
obseleted-obsoleted
Also, upgrade process is a bit more than simple unmerging;
All users who still have teTeX installed should upgrade to TeXLive
following the upgrade guide on...
--
Gokdeniz Karadag
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org writes:
Well, I'd thought that last rites plus the message in package.mask
were enough (it also mentions the URL of the migration guide).
But of course it cannot harm to have a news item in addition.
Users don't follow gentoo-dev to see last-rites.
For whatever
13 matches
Mail list logo
