Dear open source contributors,
I am Eunyoung Chung, a Masters student working with Dr. Jensen at
Oregon State University. We are currently doing a research project in
collaboration with Dr.
Truong and Ph.D student Koji Yatani at University of Toronto. Our goal
is to understand how contributors co
# Rémi Cardona (09 May 2009)
# Low-Bandwidth X and the X Proxy Management stuff has been declared
# dead since last century. All of those will be gone in 30 days
x11-apps/lbxproxy
x11-apps/proxymngr
x11-apps/xfindproxy
x11-apps/xfwp
x11-apps/xrx
x11-proto/xproxymanagementprotocol
# Rémi Cardona
Ferris McCormick posted
1241794483.15135.19.ca...@liasis.inforead.com, excerpted below, on Fri,
08 May 2009 14:54:43 +:
> Well, you could always do it over the phone. :)
I had actually contemplated that. With no additional cost VoIP to phone
calling nation- or region-wide, and "free" dire
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 12:45 +, Duncan wrote:
> Markos Chandras posted
> 200905081342.17562.hwoar...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Fri, 08 May
> 2009 13:42:13 +0300:
>
> > On Friday 08 May 2009 12:19:28 Duncan wrote:
> >> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> posted pan.2009.05.06.17.25...@cox.net,
Duncan wrote:
But no matter, the practical fact of the matter is that for someone who
would otherwise not do IRC, it's just one more hurdle in the process.
Whether it's useful or not, trivial or vital, no longer matters, it's
defined by the gatekeepers as a requirement, therefore, by said
def
Markos Chandras posted
200905081342.17562.hwoar...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Fri, 08 May
2009 13:42:13 +0300:
> On Friday 08 May 2009 12:19:28 Duncan wrote:
>> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> posted pan.2009.05.06.17.25...@cox.net,
>>[..] If a potential recruit isn't interested in IRC,
>> Ge
On Friday 08 May 2009 12:19:28 Duncan wrote:
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> posted pan.2009.05.06.17.25...@cox.net,
>[..] If a potential recruit isn't interested in IRC,
> Gentoo isn't interested in them as developers."
>
> Which, I suppose, is good to know, agree or not.
Ok now you are overreacti
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> posted pan.2009.05.06.17.25...@cox.net,
excerpted below, on Wed, 06 May 2009 17:25:15 +:
> As others have occasionally noted, the assumption seems to be that
> developers "do" IRC. While it's certainly a useful thing for those that
> do it, I believe I've seen a
