-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
I think what you are missing is that some people (me included) think
that the in-file approach is the cleanest and most obvious solution
(which also happens to not hurt performance). So if you want bad
design to be an
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:42 +, Duncan wrote:
Michael Haubenwallner ha...@gentoo.org posted on Fri, 29
May 2009 10:14:46 +0200:
Ohw, the latter would be necessary here, or '4.ebuild' would not be
found.
s/4.ebuild/4.eclass/ I assume.
Indeed.
Except... since an ebuild must
Michael Haubenwallner ha...@gentoo.org posted
1243610264.27150.293.ca...@sapc154.salomon.at, excerpted below, on Fri,
29 May 2009 17:17:44 +0200:
Wouldn't it be possible to avoid both the extension change and another
extended wait period for new incompatible(*) EAPIs, when we do this
early
Hi,
In the context of my GSOC [1] I need to get GLEP 23 [2] fully
implemented and
this means get ACCEPT_LICENSE used with a default value and bug 152593 [3]
fixed.
= GLEP 23 summary =
Most of GLEP 23 features have already been implemented in portage. Some
since
a long time (at least in stable
On Friday 29 May 2009 04:12:04 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2009 08:28:12 +0200
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is becoming a rather lengthy email ping pong, but as people seem to
be unable to discuss things I had to highlight a few issues there.
I'm sorry to be rude,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Joe Peterson lava...@gentoo.org wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
No, it's entirely objective. GLEP 55 clearly shows how the filename
based options are objectively better than anything else.
But the decision will not be based entirely on objective merits
(although I
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:36:20AM +0200, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
Package spam rdepends on =eggs-2.
Package bacon rdepends on =eggs-1.
So in theory there should be no way of installing them together (given
that eggs is not slotted). This works if I try to install them in one go.
!!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick schrieb:
It looks different, if spam is installed and I try to install bacon
additionally:
# emerge -1av bacon
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Börjesson schrieb:
# emerge -1av bacon
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild UD] app-test/eggs-1 [2] 0 kB [1]
[ebuild N] app-test/bacon-1 0 kB [1]
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:33 AM, René 'Necoro' Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Börjesson schrieb:
# emerge -1av bacon
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:33:31AM +0200, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
Patrick Börjesson schrieb:
# emerge -1av bacon
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild UD] app-test/eggs-1 [2] 0 kB [1]
[ebuild N
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a leaf package that is
not depended on by any other package in the world set? If spam IS
depended on by any
12 matches
Mail list logo
