Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org said:
Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm tired of playing, as I'm sure you are. So please,
let's be quiet now, and let the big people talk.
This is a public list designed to facilitate discussion of gentoo
software development. Anybody with something constructive to
Alistair Bush wrote:
This patch removes the functionality within java-utils-2.eclass to
record and pass to java-config old style virtuals.
This functionality is not utilized within any repo that I know about and
is _most probably_ horribly broken anyway.
_ALL_ ebuilds that are using this
Thilo Bangert bang...@gentoo.org posted
200905311126.00274.bang...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 31 May
2009 11:25:56 +0200:
the thing is though, nothing constructive is being said. people are
going in circles. ciaran and co are pushing glep55 for reasons which
they have stated
Hello people,
as the discussion about glep55 has gone in circles long enough I decided to
collect the various ideas presented around that theme complex and compare them
in a way that might allow us to reach a sane decision.
Since it has become quite a lot of text I've kept some parts in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
I've attached a script to count how many instances of each license
there are, and how many instances in each group. Here are the group
counts I get:
@FSF-APPROVED 23641
@GPL-COMPATIBLE 22956
@OSI-APPROVED 23284
@other 5998
Duncan wrote:
A team can have the best rhetoric in the world, but if they don't
actually show up and field a team on game day, they lose by default.
Fortunately or unfortunately, that looks to be where this is headed.
Agreed, there is definitely something to be said for offering solutions.
Patrick Lauer wrote:
If I should have forgotten any approach or misrepresented one I'd
appreciate an updated or rephrased section so it can be easily
updated.
This keeps coming up for some reason:
parsers: It enforces some minor limitations, for example EAPI needs to
be unique and cannot be
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-05-31 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-text/ghostscript-esp2009-05-26 05:59:58 pva
kde-base/pykde 2009-05-26 14:20:21 tampakrap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello fellow developers and users.
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
All nominations must be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list. If you
were nominated and want to run,
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
I would like to kick-start the nominations by nominating Mart Raudsepp
(leio),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a leaf package that is
not depended on by
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org posted
4a22682a.1050...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 31 May 2009
13:21:14 +0200:
Duncan wrote:
For leaf packages [-1] serves as a sort of test install.
Experimental installs and their deps typically sit in the
--depclean list for anything
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
Why
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org posted
b41005390905312058p314e6e1bnda50488d56ba0...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Sun, 31 May 2009 20:58:27 -0700:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think [trialware install] is an interesting use-case. It
14 matches
Mail list logo
