Ned Ludd posted 1246502033.5688.40.ca...@localhost,
excerpted below, on Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:33:52 -0700:
> Why would you vote for somebody who did not even publish a manifesto? I
> don't know but I love you for it. My only intention was to help offset
> dev-zero being able force the will of outs
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Ned Ludd wrote:
> The dev population is quite a strange beast. I never expected to win.
> Why would you vote for somebody who did not even publish a manifesto?
> I don't know but I love you for it. My only intention was to help offset
> dev-zero being able force the
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:33:52 -0700
Ned Ludd wrote:
>huge fscking snip<
Thank you. You were top of my list and I am counting on you. :)
Regards,
jer
The dev population is quite a strange beast. I never expected to win.
Why would you vote for somebody who did not even publish a manifesto?
I don't know but I love you for it. My only intention was to help offset
dev-zero being able force the will of outside forces upon us.
Well that has been acc
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 20:20:17 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 17:00:23 Roy Bamford wrote:
> > On behalf of the Elections project, the next Gentoo Council will be
> > composed of:-
>
> thanks for your continued effort at what most exceedingly tedious
i really have to remember
here's an item that should be relatively quick to address: fix the typo in
GLEP 39 where this line is missing (it's been in the council homepage
forever):
Only Gentoo developers may be nominated
note that previous councils already decided that they are allowed to modify
GLEP 39 in place
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 17:00:23 Roy Bamford wrote:
> On behalf of the Elections project, the next Gentoo Council will be
> composed of:-
thanks for your continued effort at what most exceedingly tedious
> solar
solar for president
> The details will be posted on the elections page shortly.
All,
On behalf of the Elections project, the next Gentoo Council will be
composed of:-
Ned Ludd(solar)
Petteri Räty(betelgeuse)
Denis Dupeyron (calchan)
Tobias Scherbaum(dertobi123)
Ulrich Müller (ulm)
Mart Raudsepp (leio)
Luca Bar
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:00:35 +0300
> Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
>> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:25:11 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0300
>>>
>>> Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs
>>> Really? Anyone who has any vers
On Wednesday 01 of July 2009 17:14:11 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> Hello
>
> Somewhat continuing my battle to reasonably minimise USE flags enabled by
> default for users, I'd like to ask about one particular commit. Note that
> there's no commit message and it looks a bit fishy:
>
> http://sources.ge
Maciej Mrozowski said:
> Hello
>
> Somewhat continuing my battle to reasonably minimise USE flags enabled by
> default for users, I'd like to ask about one particular commit. Note that
> there's no commit message and it looks a bit fishy:
>
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-
> x86/
Hello
Somewhat continuing my battle to reasonably minimise USE flags enabled by
default for users, I'd like to ask about one particular commit. Note that
there's no commit message and it looks a bit fishy:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-
x86/profiles/base/use.defaults?r1=1.1&r2=1.1
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 17:06:10 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:00:35 +0300
>
> Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:25:11 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0300
> > >
> > > Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> > > > Display-If-Installed: kde-b
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:00:35 +0300
Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:25:11 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0300
> >
> > Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> > > Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs
> >
> > Really? Anyone who has any version of kdelibs ever?
>
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:25:11 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0300
>
> Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> > Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs
>
> Really? Anyone who has any version of kdelibs ever?
Yes, this affects kde3 and kde4 users.
--
Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap)
Ge
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:45:29 +0300
Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs
Really? Anyone who has any version of kdelibs ever?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
i'm sending it again as it should be
Title: kdeprefix and monolithic ebuilds issues
Author: Theo Chatzimichos
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted:
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs
The Gentoo KDE Guide has been updated and now covers the two most
serious issues
Theo Chatzimichos posted
200907011501.17632.tampak...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 01 Jul
2009 15:01:17 +0300:
> Thank you duncan for the typo.
> [0] http:///www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/kde/kde4-guide.xml
Umm... it's still there...
Meanwhile, on that web page, there's a minor issue
# Theo Chatzimichos (1 Jul 2009)
# koffice monolithic masked, latest koffice version
# 1.6.3_p20090204 provides only split ebuilds, please
# refer to the KDE guide for more info
# http://kde.gentoo.org/kde4-guide.xml
app-office/koffice
--
Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap)
Gentoo KDE/Qt Team
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 10:22:19 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Theo Chatzimichos :
> > The Gentoo KDE Guide has been updated and now covers the two most
> > serious issues affecting KDE users:
>
> Make it look something like
>
> "1.) masking of the kdeprefix USE flag for KDE 4 users and
>
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
21 matches
Mail list logo
