On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Andrey Grozin
wrote:
> So, the two directories are identical, but repoman behaves differently.
>
That's because repoman is context-aware. When you use it, it'll look
"around" (../..) the current directory for the dependencies. If it
finds the deps, it'll check if
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
I just tried it here and I don't get any errors from repoman. I've run
repoman full -d and it only complains about ebuild.allmasked. Have you
synced the entire repo? In particular the profiles/* tree?
Yes, of course I synced the tree. Now I see even a more stra
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:15:34 +0200
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Personally I don't see how gaming the system helps us in any way.
>
> I was afraid it could be read in such a way. Handing out fake version
> numbers would be much easier, wouldn't it? I want every single packag
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-09-13 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-misc/netgo 2009-09-07 11:59:11 flameeyes
sci-visualization/qmatplot 2009-09-07 12:01:10 flameeyes
media-sound/noteedit
Alex Legler wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>
>> As has been said before, a lot of people don't go to the forums to see
>> the poll. I only go to the forums to search if I have a problem
>> before posting to the list. There may have been a dozen polls on the
>> foru
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
> As has been said before, a lot of people don't go to the forums to see
> the poll. I only go to the forums to search if I have a problem
> before posting to the list. There may have been a dozen polls on the
> forums and I would have no idea the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrey Grozin wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> I am fixing a bug (#284080) in a ebuild
> (sci-visualization/mayavi-3.3.0). I have a fix that installs on my
> box fine, all deps are satisfied. I try to commit it, but repoman
> issues a lot of errors like
>
> RDEPE
Alex Legler wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:25:19 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>
>> Where are these referrer logs? I don't recall ever doing one of
>> those.
>>
>>
>
> They are in the web server logs. Apache includes them in the "combined"
> log format, or you can add them in a custom log format
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:25:19 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
> Where are these referrer logs? I don't recall ever doing one of
> those.
>
They are in the web server logs. Apache includes them in the "combined"
log format, or you can add them in a custom log format.
So cooperation with Infra is require
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
>> Good question. How would a person know if distrowatch leads people to
>> Gentoo or not? It's not like there is really any way to find out.
>>
>
> - analysing referrer logs
> - doing polls
>
>
>
> sebastian
>
>
>
Where are these referrer logs
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Not quite. If both an overlay and the main tree provide foo-1.2,
> masking foo-1.2::overlay in Portage would end up masking every foo-1.2.
Why?
> You also need proper multiple repository support to make it work;
> merely adding repo dep specs on top of a pure overlay mod
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:41:13 +0200, Patrick Lauer
wrote:
> On Sunday 13 September 2009 21:03:13 Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:57:48 +0200, Patrick Lauer
>>
>> wrote:
>> > First issue: How do I find out in which overlay stuff is?
>>
>> http://gentoo.zapto.org/
>
> That's not a
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:45:59 +0200
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Alexander Færøy wrote:
> >> Second issue: "I want foopackage and barpackage, but not your
> >> hacked gcc" Overlays can overshadow tree packages, which can have
> >> undesired effects.
> >
> > Support for overlay information in package
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 09:45:59PM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Once we have repository-specific atoms we get that for free.
> Maybe we can not make it take ages somehow.
Indeed. Perhaps it is time for the users to start bribing Zac.
--
Alexander Færøy
Duncan wrote:
> Agreed. Yes, overlays are perhaps a bit more trouble to setup than
> simply maintaining normal tree updates once setup. But let's get some
> context here. layman's no difficulty at all, really, when compared to
> the ordinary stuff we expect Gentoo users to do all the time. G
Dale wrote:
> Good question. How would a person know if distrowatch leads people to
> Gentoo or not? It's not like there is really any way to find out.
- analysing referrer logs
- doing polls
sebastian
Alexander Færøy wrote:
>> Second issue: "I want foopackage and barpackage, but not your hacked gcc"
>> Overlays can overshadow tree packages, which can have undesired effects.
>
> Support for overlay information in package.mask?
Once we have repository-specific atoms we get that for free.
Maybe w
On Sunday 13 September 2009 21:03:13 Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:57:48 +0200, Patrick Lauer
>
> wrote:
> > First issue: How do I find out in which overlay stuff is?
>
> http://gentoo.zapto.org/
That's not an official project, not mentioned in the layman docs afaik (feel
free
Richard Freeman wrote:
> Personally, I like the overlay idea, but right now it just isn't
> necessary. In theory proxy maintainers work almost as well, and we're
> not really making heavy use of this model right now.
I disagree about this. One of the reasons my overlay is fun to me is
because I
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:47:27 -0400, Richard Freeman
>> Right now it is at least a little painful to get set up with an overlay.
>
> No, it's a matter of using layman -a
I think Richard was including the manual setup required to use layman
and the procedure required to ad
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:57:48 +0200, Patrick Lauer
wrote:
>
> First issue: How do I find out in which overlay stuff is?
http://gentoo.zapto.org/
> Second issue: "I want foopackage and barpackage, but not your hacked
gcc"
> Overlays can overshadow tree packages, which can have undesired effects.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 08:57:48PM +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> First issue: How do I find out in which overlay stuff is?
Paludis' solution to that issue is the unavailable repository[1]. It is
a repository that contains enough information about the packages in the
repositories to display inform
On Sunday 13 September 2009 13:30:13 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Richard Freeman schrieb:
> > Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> >> Most Gentoo users will have no problem to use overlays as they need
> >> them. If we had more developers we could as maintain more packages,
> >> as simple as that.
> >
> > I actually
Hello *,
I am fixing a bug (#284080) in a ebuild (sci-visualization/mayavi-3.3.0).
I have a fix that installs on my box fine, all deps are satisfied. I try
to commit it, but repoman issues a lot of errors like
RDEPEND.bad 25
sci-visualization/mayavi/mayavi-3.3.0.ebuild:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 09:36 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
Seriously, I doubt that the average Gentoo user comes from
>> Distrowatch.
>>
Gentoo is born from a necessity which is very different from the
>> usual
>>
binary distro.
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 09:36 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> Seriously, I doubt that the average Gentoo user comes from
> Distrowatch.
> >> Gentoo is born from a necessity which is very different from the
> usual
> >> binary distro. Gentoo has never been about fame or marketing.
> - - I came here because
Duncan wrote:
> Jesús Guerrero posted on Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:11:42 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>
>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:02:44 +0200, Sebastian Pipping
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Among other information the Gentoo page at DistroWatch [1] displays a
>>> table on about 200 selected packages [2] and how up
Jesús Guerrero posted on Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:11:42 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:02:44 +0200, Sebastian Pipping
> wrote:
>>
>> Among other information the Gentoo page at DistroWatch [1] displays a
>> table on about 200 selected packages [2] and how up to date Gentoo is
>> per pack
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
Yeah, devs for that as well.
Yup - I think we're actually on the same page. Ultimately quality
matters more than quantity and everybody does what they can given the
resources we have.
Right now it is at least a little painful to get set up with an overlay.
No, it's
Richard Freeman schrieb:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>>
>> Most Gentoo users will have no problem to use overlays as they need
>> them. If we had more developers we could as maintain more packages,
>> as simple as that.
>>
>
> I actually tend to agree with this position, however to use overlays as
> a
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:47:27 -0400, Richard Freeman
wrote:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>>
>> Most Gentoo users will have no problem to use overlays as they need
>> them. If we had more developers we could as maintain more packages,
>> as simple as that.
>>
>
> I actually tend to agree with this pos
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
Most Gentoo users will have no problem to use overlays as they need
them. If we had more developers we could as maintain more packages,
as simple as that.
I actually tend to agree with this position, however to use overlays as
a valid solution for end-users we need to d
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:02:44 +0200, Sebastian Pipping
wrote:
> Hello there!
>
>
> Among other information the Gentoo page at DistroWatch [1] displays a
> table on about 200 selected packages [2] and how up to date Gentoo is
> per package. I assume that DistroWatch is still one of the first plac
33 matches
Mail list logo
