On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:03:28 +0200
Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> For FEATURES="test" a policy for how to handle stuff like:
>
> if use test; then
> elog
> ewarn "You have unit tests enabled, this results in an insecure
> library"
> ewarn "It is recom
lör 2009-10-03 klockan 14:21 -0600 skrev Ryan Hill:
> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> > Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED="1" to force ld behave
> > asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
> >
> > Speak up if you think it's a t
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-10-04 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
games-emulation/fceultra2009-09-29 06:16:42
mr_bones_
games-emulation/gfceu 2009-09-29 06:17:16
mr_b
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> So in conclusion I've removed the profiles from profiles.desc, so
> repoman won't complain about it.
Scratch that. Reverted. Repoman is way too loud with it removed. Let's
simply remove it where seen in slow pace.
-Samuli
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> All this spawned from the fact that dev-lang/python is now using
> external toolchain package, dev-libs/libffi, which nobody can test. So,
> if you can't have libffi, you can't have python and you can't have portage.
With that regard,
Also mips and m68k are undone...
-Sa
I've discussed this with Diego and Roy today, the only 2 persons who had
such systems. The end result was that there's no developers for the
arch, and we can let it die. It was a nice experiment but didn't fly.
So in conclusion I've removed the profiles from profiles.desc, so
repoman won't complai
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 21:42, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who cares about
> networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary. I'm pretty sure.
>
> I also did the x86 quickinstall handbooks.
Thanks Joshua!
--
Alex || wired
Joshua Saddler wrote:
> There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who cares about
> networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary. I'm pretty sure.
>
> I also did the x86 quickinstall handbooks.
>
> GDP, and interested devs who can contribute patches to Bugzilla:
>
>
Hi,
Joshua Saddler :
> There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who
> cares about networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary.
> I'm pretty sure.
Thank you.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp o
2009-10-04 20:32:17 Hanno Böck napisał(a):
> I just stepped over a problem with the new python-wrapper. If I interpreted
> the changelogs correctly, since eselect-python-20090801 /usr/bin/python is no
> longer a symlink, but a wrapper.
Since eselect-python-20090804 /usr/bin/python is a symlink t
There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who cares about
networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary. I'm pretty sure.
I also did the x86 quickinstall handbooks.
GDP, and interested devs who can contribute patches to Bugzilla:
Please review all the files I touch
Hi,
I just stepped over a problem with the new python-wrapper. If I interpreted
the changelogs correctly, since eselect-python-20090801 /usr/bin/python is no
longer a symlink, but a wrapper.
I find this a questionable idea simply for the overhead it causes, but it
seems that this breaks all in
On 04-10-2009 13:13:30 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> +# @FUNCTION: no-as-needed
> +# @RETURN: Flag to disable asneeded behavior for use with append-ldflags.
> +no-as-needed() {
> + case $($(tc-getLD) -v 2>&1 + *GNU*) # GNU ld
> + echo "-Wl,--no-as-needed" ;;
> + e
Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:45:21 +0300 Markos Chandras
wrote:
This is actually true. Maybe all devs should have access on docs
since the docs teams are dead. I would suggest to let all
developers contribute to documentation whether they belong to docs
team or not
No. Many (m
Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> Perhaps we could add a new function to the flag-o-matic that does the
>>> CHOST check, and appends the flag, so the check code wouldn't have to be
>>> duplicated in ebuilds? It should be rather trivial.
>>
>> ok, chost check would be cheap. how about,
>> usage: append-ldfl
15 matches
Mail list logo
