Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in net-mail/getmail: ChangeLog getmail-4.9.2.ebuild

2009-10-16 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 13 octobre 2009 à 23:48 +0200, Jeroen Roovers a écrit : > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:22:13 +0200 > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > We are working on a proper explanation targetted to devs of this. I'm > > sorry for the inconvenience caused. > > How large of a change to the tree will this invol

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite (part 1): KDE3-only applications that won't build when KDE4 is installed

2009-10-16 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (16 Oct 2009) # Fails to build with KDE4 installed wrt bug #277427. # Masked for removal in 30 days. net-news/eventwatcher # Samuli Suominen (16 Oct 2009) # Fails to build with KDE4 installed wrt bug #277417. # Masked for removal in 30 days. kde-misc/kisdnwatch # Samuli Suomin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in net-mail/getmail: ChangeLog getmail-4.9.2.ebuild

2009-10-16 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le mardi 13 octobre 2009 à 23:48 +0200, Jeroen Roovers a écrit : On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:22:13 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: We are working on a proper explanation targetted to devs of this. I'm sorry for the inconvenience caused. How large of a change to the tree

[gentoo-dev] New ebuild metadata to mark how robust the package is?

2009-10-16 Thread Daniel Bradshaw
Hi all, It occurs to me that my work flow when doing updates follows a fairly predictable (and probably common) pattern. The obvious next step is to wonder why no one though of automating it... When doing updates I tend to look through the package list and classify things based on how likely they

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ebuild metadata to mark how robust the package is?

2009-10-16 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Daniel Bradshaw wrote: Hi all, It occurs to me that my work flow when doing updates follows a fairly predictable (and probably common) pattern. The obvious next step is to wonder why no one though of automating it... When doing updates I tend to look through the package list and classify things

[gentoo-dev] Re: New ebuild metadata to mark how robust the package is?

2009-10-16 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:29:00 - (UTC) "Daniel Bradshaw" wrote: > Hi all, > > It occurs to me that my work flow when doing updates follows a fairly > predictable (and probably common) pattern. > The obvious next step is to wonder why no one though of automating it... > > When doing updates I

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ebuild metadata to mark how robust the package is?

2009-10-16 Thread Rémi Cardona
Hi Daniel, Le 17/10/2009 01:29, Daniel Bradshaw a écrit : So as I say, it occurs to me that most people probably follow some variation of this selective upgrade method. It might be handy to have some kind of metadata in the ebuilds that can be used to indicate a package that is "demanding". Then