Hi devs,
while there is the appreciated multiple ABI portage support going on,
a thought on the intentions of the multilib profiles.
Some background:
I do have to support building an older, but still maintained large
application software, that simply does not work when built as 64bit.
As it does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recently, virtualx.eclass changed how it adds dependencies. Previously,
it always added IUSE=X, and added X? ( x11-base/xorg-server
x11-apps/xhost ) to both DEPEND and RDEPEND (the RDEPEND part appears
to have been unintentional). This has been
On 10/20/2009 04:06 PM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Isn't the intention of multilib to have a new (64bit) system
be compatible with the corresponding old (32bit) system?
I'm not sure I understand the whole procedure you use to build this app.
Why not simply use -m32 when building it? Why
Michael Haubenwallner schrieb:
Isn't the intention of multilib to have a new (64bit) system
be compatible with the corresponding old (32bit) system?
Please comment, thank you!
/haubi/
If you have a 64bit system, the default should be 64bit, both for libs and for
binaries. The
additional
Thomas Sachau posted on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:29:25 +0200 as excerpted:
Michael Haubenwallner schrieb:
Isn't the intention of multilib to have a new (64bit) system be
compatible with the corresponding old (32bit) system?
Please comment, thank you!
/haubi/
If you have a 64bit system, the
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 12:25:15 Duncan wrote:
Thomas Sachau posted on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:29:25 +0200 as excerpted:
Michael Haubenwallner schrieb:
Isn't the intention of multilib to have a new (64bit) system be
compatible with the corresponding old (32bit) system?
Please comment,
On Monday 19 October 2009 16:59:55 Thomas Sachau wrote:
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
the majority of the time, the compiler driver (i.e. `gcc`) should be used
for linking. very few packages should invoke the linker directly. that
is why currently the toolchain-func.eclass has tc-getLD return
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 09:06:29 Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
As I'm building the toolchain myself too, I configure it with the
32bit host triplet on each platform, usually disabling multilib.
this doesnt make any sense to me
This simply works for ppc-aix, hppa-hpux, ia64-hpux,
Greetings,
The KDE Team will have its usual monthly meeting this Thursday.
Date: Thursday, 2009/10/22
Time: 1900 UTC
Channel: #gentoo-meetings
Late announcement, I know, but I guess better late than never :)
Reply to this email with anything you'd like to have discussed at the meeting.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
if you read FHS you'll see that both implementations are allowed. Gentoo
isnt
violating anything here. wrt LSB, who knows. there are a ton of things we
dont follow with LSB.
Actually, at first, FHS says that any /libqual would be allowed, but
it then goes into
Hello,
Since the 10.0 release there has not been an outward facing announcement
for users to switch profiles.
* Are we deprecating the 2008.0 profiles?
* Are 10.0 profiles feature complete ?
* Will there be an announcement?
* Why are only the 2008.0 hardened profiles deprecated? ( %% find
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 16:47:50 Jonathan Callen wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
The problem was that Gentoo's early amd64 implementation predated this
standardization, and we had chosen the other way. While we've defaulted
to lib64 for 64-bit libs for years, it has never been considered
Hello, everyone.
I think all you know the utility revdep-rebuild. It's very usefull. But it
has
some nasty features, such as totally ignoreing of emerge default options
set in
/etc/make.conf
Would you like portage to be verbose? Ignored.
Do you like portage showing you what's going to be
Arthur D. posted on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:23:54 +0300 as excerpted:
I suggested my help in developing the script. I asked him what options
will break things...
No answer. 12 days left.
FWIW, 12 days isn't so bad. It's often two weeks before you get a first
maintainer response on a bug (I'd
Arthur D. wrote:
Would you like portage to be verbose? Ignored.
Do you like portage showing you what's going to be emerged? Ignored!
Do you wish portage to ask for your confirmation before actually doing
compilation?
Yes, IGNORED!
I'd suggest passing the -p option to revdep-rebuild on the
15 matches
Mail list logo
