On Monday 01 March 2010 23:24:56 Ben de Groot wrote:
> For some reason beyond my understanding, we have the cups useflag
> enabled by default in profiles. This has started to generate circular
> dependencies, at least for desktop profile users (gtk -> cups ->
> poppler -> gtk). I propose we no long
On 03/02/2010 07:53 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/1/10 11:09 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> On Monday 01 of March 2010 22:24:56 Ben de Groot wrote:
>>> For some reason beyond my understanding, we have the cups useflag
>>> enabled by default in profiles. This has started to generate circular
On 3/1/10 11:09 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Monday 01 of March 2010 22:24:56 Ben de Groot wrote:
>> For some reason beyond my understanding, we have the cups useflag
>> enabled by default in profiles. This has started to generate circular
>> dependencies, at least for desktop profile users (gt
+1 for disabling it by default, long as it's done with care,
because it pretty hard for a newbie to understand what the hell is going on on
his first installation and a lot of people use the desktop profile since it's
one of the best way to install Gentoo for the first time.
Sylvain
> Date
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:02:05 +0100 as excerpted:
>
>> Quoting Ioannis Aslanidis :
>>> I would prefer to keep the keyword for Bugday Members to administer.
>>
>> I don't think that sending mails would wor
Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:02:05 +0100 as excerpted:
> Quoting Ioannis Aslanidis :
>> I would prefer to keep the keyword for Bugday Members to administer.
>
> I don't think that sending mails would work well. If you want extra
> control/QA for bugday team members I would prop
On Thursday 25 of February 2010 04:11:49 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 of February 2010 03:25:16 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>
> If no objections, I'm going to commit in 5 days the following patch to
> eutils.eclass
>
> Index: eutils.eclass
> ==
That sounds great!
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>
> Quoting Ioannis Aslanidis :
>>
>> I would prefer to keep the keyword for
>> Bugday Members to administer.
>
> I don't think that sending mails would work well.
> If you want extra control/QA for bugday team members
>
Quoting Ioannis Aslanidis :
I would prefer to keep the keyword for
Bugday Members to administer.
I don't think that sending mails would work well.
If you want extra control/QA for bugday team members
I would propose two different keywords: one for bugday
candidates and one for confirmed bugday
2010-03-01 06:13:19 Max Arnold napisał(a):
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:13:10AM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
> > (Please note that wrapper scripts generated by
> > python_generate_wrapper_scripts() work
> > with all versions of Python from 2.4 to 3.2, so shebangs in the
On 01/03/2010 22:19, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 1 March 2010 22:17, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
[...]
Great ideas!
The teams should send the list of
bugs, with each bug filling a skeleton similar to the following:
* Ticket number.
* Title.
* Clear, easy to understand, short description of w
Ioannis Aslanidis said:
> Hello,
> [... whole bunch of ideas ...]
> Let me hear of what you have to say to all this.
Has anyone looked at how others projects do bugdays? We shouldn't need
to reinvent the wheel here and can probably get some great ideas from
other distributions out there.
--
I understand that the implication and the time demand of this last
point may be a little excessive. If anyone still has the time to fill
the skeleton in, they are still welcome to do it. Otherwise with the
bug list it will be enough. I would prefer to keep the keyword for
Bugday Members to administ
On 1 March 2010 22:17, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
> [...]
Great ideas!
> The teams should send the list of
> bugs, with each bug filling a skeleton similar to the following:
>
> * Ticket number.
> * Title.
> * Clear, easy to understand, short description of what we want to
> delegate to our use
On Monday 01 of March 2010 22:24:56 Ben de Groot wrote:
> For some reason beyond my understanding, we have the cups useflag
> enabled by default in profiles. This has started to generate circular
> dependencies, at least for desktop profile users (gtk -> cups ->
> poppler -> gtk). I propose we no l
On 03/01/2010 11:24 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> For some reason beyond my understanding, we have the cups useflag
> enabled by default in profiles. This has started to generate circular
> dependencies, at least for desktop profile users (gtk -> cups ->
> poppler -> gtk). I propose we no longer enable
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 22:24, Ben de Groot wrote:
> For some reason beyond my understanding, we have the cups useflag
> enabled by default in profiles.
I'm +1 on disabling it by default.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On 03/01/2010 01:24 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> For some reason beyond my understanding, we have the cups useflag
> enabled by default in profiles. This has started to generate circular
> dependencies, at least for desktop profile users (gtk -> cups ->
> poppler -> gtk). I propose we no longer enable
For some reason beyond my understanding, we have the cups useflag
enabled by default in profiles. This has started to generate circular
dependencies, at least for desktop profile users (gtk -> cups ->
poppler -> gtk). I propose we no longer enable the cups useflag.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo
Hello,
After having a talk with Sebastien (aka sping), I think it is time to
give a clear reply from my side to this discussion, given that I am
still a member of the project and I am willing to rescue it.
At this moment, the Bugday Project is starving because no one feeds
it. It needs to eat bug
# Samuli Suominen (01 Mar 2010)
# Orphaned library for obsolete musepack API support.
# Doesn't work with autoconf 2.65. Masked for removal
# in 30 days. See bug 294582.
media-libs/libmpcdecsv7
(The new libmpcdec API is in musepack-tools which all pkgs in gentoo-x86
now use. :-)
# Ben de Groot (01 Mar 2010)
# Grand mask of qt:3 and remaining reverse dependencies
# pending removal on 21 Mar 2010 (bug 283429)
=x11-libs/qt-3*
app-misc/chesstask
app-office/indeview
dev-db/qt-unixODBC
dev-embedded/yapide
dev-util/bouml
dev-util/gambas
dev-util/qsoapman
games-board/mahjongg3d
On 03/01/2010 09:24 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
The 72 hours have passed, so I take it we are ready to officially
publish this. Richard, are you going to commit this?
I will do so today.
The 72 hours have passed, so I take it we are ready to officially
publish this. Richard, are you going to commit this?
Thanks,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-03-2010 06:39, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Friday 26 February 2010 18:40:47 Alec Warner wrote:
>> You mistake the intent I think. We deploy automation because humans
>> fail; even when they have the best intentions. We make typos, copy
>> and p
# Samuli Suominen (01 Mar 2010)
# Orphaned library. Doesn't compile with recent toolchain.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 300595.
dev-tex/mplib
On 03/01/2010 10:58 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>
>
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> and renamed snapshot variable into saner XORG_EAUTORECONF.
>
>> Does it fit your needs?
>
> Sane enough for me ;), thank you!
>
> /haubi/
I'd prefer EAUTORECONF (as it's already used in xfconf.eclass for the
sa
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 3rd Thursday at 1800 UTC / 2000 CET / 1400 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> and renamed snapshot variable into saner XORG_EAUTORECONF.
> Does it fit your needs?
Sane enough for me ;), thank you!
/haubi/
--
Michael Haubenwallner
Gentoo on a different level
29 matches
Mail list logo
