Alec Warner posted on Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:53:14 -0800 as excerpted:
>> you dont need an account to "subscribe" (read/track updates). anyone
>> can do that anonymously.
>> -mike
Thanks. That wasn't clear from the original. Good to make it explicit
(as you have now several times). =:^)
> I thi
On 03/11/2010 03:53 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> however if it becomes some kind of integral part of Gentoo
(which I doubt it will) we will have to look at switching to something
else (which is easy given the many export formats of Google Calendar
:))
I think you hit the nail on the head. Right no
On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
>
> I suggest reading my comments...
Unless I missed something, you didn't make any comments on this
thread.
If you mean t
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 11 March 2010 00:10:00 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:42:43 + (UTC) Duncan wrote:
>> > So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at
>> > least if they want calendar access?
>> >
>> > Wha
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 8 March 2010 02:17, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> >
> > I attached the news item, please review. Meanwhile, I'll create docs
> > patches.
> >
> > Also, I'm CCing hardened as my No.1 question was not answered. Please do.
> > Thanks
>
> Seei
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Jacob Godserv wrote:
> The problem here, I think, is everyone has their opinion about what it
> means for something to go stable, and I haven't seen more than one or
> two references to what has been predetermined as policy for
> stabilization. I think we should do
On Thursday 11 March 2010 00:10:00 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:42:43 + (UTC) Duncan wrote:
> > So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at
> > least if they want calendar access?
> >
> > What about those who might think that Google knows enough about t
Il giorno 11/mar/2010, alle ore 12.35, Ben de Groot ha scritto:
> On 11 March 2010 10:01, Michele Noberasco wrote:
>> sorry to post a very n00b question on the list, but since I haven't done
>> that in... uh years... I cannot remember the procedure to follow for masking
>> a package for automat
On 11 March 2010 10:01, Michele Noberasco wrote:
> sorry to post a very n00b question on the list, but since I haven't done that
> in... uh years... I cannot remember the procedure to follow for masking a
> package for automated removal from the tree. Can someone give me a heads up
> or point m
Hi,
sorry to post a very n00b question on the list, but since I haven't done that
in... uh years... I cannot remember the procedure to follow for masking a
package for automated removal from the tree. Can someone give me a heads up or
point me to the relevant documentation?
Thanks,
Michele Nob
10 matches
Mail list logo
