On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:45:20AM +0200, Michaaa GGGrny wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:12:08 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Should we add a RESTRICT=parallel value for ebuilds that can't be
built at the same time as other ebuilds? Brian says we need it for
things like
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Matti Bickel m...@gentoo.org wrote:
I rather like the changelogs auto-generated. A method to link my git
commit to bugzie would be awesome. I *do* envy debian and others for the
auto bughandling they have. Previewing more than a raw number would also
reduce
On 14/04/10 04:12, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi everyone,
Should we add a RESTRICT=parallel value for ebuilds that can't be
built at the same time as other ebuilds? Brian says we need it for
things like xorg-server which calls eselect opengl.
There is at least one other example which benefits from
Brian Harring posted on Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:10:16 -0700 as excerpted:
RESTRICT=parallel is basically a big lock that forces building to go
down to one specific build/merge job- it's not at all fine grained. That
said, I'm not convinced it's worth actually *trying* to be fine grained.
Stuff
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:06:56AM +, Duncan wrote:
Brian Harring posted on Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:10:16 -0700 as excerpted:
RESTRICT=parallel is basically a big lock that forces building to go
down to one specific build/merge job- it's not at all fine grained. That
said, I'm not
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Matti Bickel m...@gentoo.org wrote:
I rather like the changelogs auto-generated. A method to link my git
commit to bugzie would be awesome. I *do* envy debian and others for the
auto bughandling they have. Previewing more than a raw
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:46:15 +0200 Justin j...@gentoo.org wrote:
There is at least one other example which benefits from singlular
build, atlas libs. They run a benchmark suite to create platform
specific headers, which is heavily influenced by the system load. So
having RESTRICT=parallel
Justin posted on Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:46:15 +0200 as excerpted:
On 14/04/10 04:12, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi everyone,
Should we add a RESTRICT=parallel value for ebuilds that can't be built
at the same time as other ebuilds? Brian says we need it for things
like xorg-server which calls eselect
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:10:16 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Running multiple emerges in parallel is already a bad idea. The
solution for that case is for the new/second emerge to feed the
request into the original emerge (or a daemon).
Although such solution will be useful
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:20:18PM +0200, Michaaa GGGrny wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:10:16 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Running multiple emerges in parallel is already a bad idea. The
solution for that case is for the new/second emerge to feed the
request into the
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:10:29 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Running multiple emerge's in parallel is unsafe due to the fact
they've got two potentially very different plans as to what is being
done, and that there is no possibility to ensure that pkg D that PM-2
is building
Brian Harring posted on Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:10:29 -0700 as excerpted:
The next thing is aborting merges. When running multiple emerges,
aborting one of them is as simple as pressing ^c. With daemon, we would
have to implement an ability of aborting/removing packages in runtime
-- and that
hello!
lifera is maintainer-needed at the moment.
iskren slavov is here to help out but he'll need you as a dev to proxy
him for now. he's started working on an ebuild in his gentoo-hosted
overlay, already [2]; contact info's up there, too. please step up if
you can do this.
thanks in
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:31:34 +0200
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
hello!
lifera is maintainer-needed at the moment.
iskren slavov is here to help out but he'll need you as a dev to proxy
him for now. he's started working on an ebuild in his gentoo-hosted
overlay, already
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think that the packages that currently depend on one icon theme, could
instead just depend on that virtual. For example, xfce works fine
without the xfce theme, provided some other theme (like gnome or tango)
is
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 01:34:46PM +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
app-admin/authconfig
(just checking, this is the nsswitch.conf changer right?), if so, then
add to below.
net-misc/fcoe-utils
sys-apps/hbaapi
16 matches
Mail list logo
