Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > Can we do away with all the extra foo && return bullshit and just set > a trap? > > trap "eshopts pop" RETURN > > ? That strikes me as a horribly fragile way of doing things that's bound to come back and screw things up at some point...

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: eclass/php5_1.eclass

2010-07-19 Thread Alex Alexander
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:05:18PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:23:03 +0200 > > Matti Bickel wrote: > > > >> On 07/17/2010 09:58 PM, Matti Bickel wrote: > >> > since there's no dev-lang/php-5.1* version in the tree any

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-utils.eclass

2010-07-19 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Sunday 18 of July 2010 03:54:43 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > grep EAPI-TOO-OLD $(portageq portdir)/eclass/* > /home/gentoo-cvs/gentoo-x86/eclass/kde4-functions.eclass: *) > DEPEND="EAPI-TOO-OLD" ;; > /home/gentoo-cvs/gentoo-x86/eclass/poppler.eclass:has 2 ${EAPI} || > DEPEND="EAPI-

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-utils.eclass

2010-07-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:23:36 +0200 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > status quo should be challenged occasionally. > > Fixed autotools-utils.eclass, kde4-functions.eclass, virtuoso.eclass > case ${EAPI:-0} in > 2|3|4) ;; > - *) > DEPEND="EAPI-TOO-OLD" ;;

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-19 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:50:00 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: > The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some > help here. Thanks Down to 7 now. jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-19 Thread Alex Alexander
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:01:38PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:50:00 +0300 > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some > > help here. Thanks > > Down to 7 now. wow. nice work! -- Alex Alexander :: wired Gentoo Deve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 19-07-2010 a las 21:05 +0300, Alex Alexander escribió: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:01:38PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:50:00 +0300 > > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > > > The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some > > > help here. Thanks >

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-utils.eclass

2010-07-19 Thread Francesco R
2010/7/19 Ciaran McCreesh > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:23:36 +0200 > Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > > status quo should be challenged occasionally. > > > > Fixed autotools-utils.eclass, kde4-functions.eclass, virtuoso.eclass > > case ${EAPI:-0} in > > 2|3|4) ;; > > - *) > > DEPEND="EAPI-TO

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 19, 2010 03:38:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > > Can we do away with all the extra foo && return bullshit and just set > > a trap? > > > > trap "eshopts pop" RETURN > > > > ? > > That strikes me as a horribly fragile way of doi

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday, July 19, 2010 03:38:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: >> > Can we do away with all the extra foo && return bullshit and just set >> > a trap? >> > >> > trap "eshopts pop" RETURN >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread David Leverton
On 19 July 2010 20:43, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday, July 19, 2010 03:38:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: >> > Can we do away with all the extra foo && return bullshit and just set >> > a trap? >> > >> > trap "eshopts pop" RETURN >> > >> >  ?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Over using preserve_old_lib, don't do that

2010-07-19 Thread Jim Ramsay
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:28:40PM +0200, Markus Hauschild wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Mike Auty wrote: > > Ideally, these calls should either adhere to FEATURES="-preserve-libs", > > or there should be a tool that can identify which files portage has > > preserved, and allow easy r

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 19, 2010 16:07:56 David Leverton wrote: > On 19 July 2010 20:43, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday, July 19, 2010 03:38:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > >> > Can we do away with all the extra foo && return bullshit and just se

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread David Leverton
On 19 July 2010 21:30, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i imagine this might be useful in some scenarios, but i think the more common > usage is to enable things inline.  otherwise, the exported API would need to > be wrapped internally like: > get_all_version_components() { >        eshopts_need _get_all_

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 19, 2010 16:45:22 David Leverton wrote: > On 19 July 2010 21:30, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i imagine this might be useful in some scenarios, but i think the more > > common usage is to enable things inline. otherwise, the exported API > > would need to be wrapped internally like:

Re: [gentoo-dev] new warnings to catch from gcc in portage

2010-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
no feed back, so pushed to latest portage. guess we'll see what blows up. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread David Leverton
On 19 July 2010 22:11, Mike Frysinger wrote: > you mean the people who want to use get_all_version_components would have to > change their invocation to go through eshops_need ?  otherwise i dont follow > what you mean. You define the function, then call eshopts_need immediately afterwards, and i

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 19, 2010 17:44:21 David Leverton wrote: > On 19 July 2010 22:11, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > you mean the people who want to use get_all_version_components would have > > to change their invocation to go through eshops_need ? otherwise i dont > > follow what you mean. > > You define

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-utils.eclass

2010-07-19 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sunday 18 July 2010 04:54:43 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > On 18-07-2010 00:58, Brian Harring wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 02:56:05AM +0300, Alexis Ballier wrote: > >> case ${EAPI:-0} in > >> > >>2|3|4) ;; > >>*) DEPEND="EAPI-TOO-OLD" ;; > >> > >> esac > >> > >> why not: >