Re: [gentoo-dev] Improve devaway system

2010-08-31 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:13:15PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote: > Hello fellow developers. > > On 08/30/2010 04:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > Sounds good to me, but I'd actually be more interested in having > > something the other way around; i.e. monitoring for activity in > > commits, bugzill

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for net-misc/omnievents

2010-08-31 Thread Thilo Bangert
Alec Warner said: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Diego E. Pettenò wrote: > > # Diego E. Pettenņ (30 Aug 2010) > > # on behalf of QA team > > # > > # Initial import in 2005 and never bumped; no users in tree; > > What does 'no users in tree' mean? No revdeps? I read this as: nothing in t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improve devaway system

2010-08-31 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:03:21AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > How about this as an idea: > 1. Include a parsaable return date I suggest ("Returning:/MM/DD", > "Returning:Unknown") > 2. Automated emails when: > 2.1. It's after the return date (weekly). Ok but what about the Returning:Un

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improve devaway system

2010-08-31 Thread Arttu V.
On 8/31/10, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:03:21AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> >> How about this as an idea: >> 1. Include a parsaable return date I suggest ("Returning:/MM/DD", >> "Returning:Unknown") >> 2. Automated emails when: >> 2.1. It's after the return date (

[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for sys-auth/pam_pwdfile

2010-08-31 Thread Diego E . Pettenò
# Diego E. Pettenò (31 Aug 2010) # on behalf of QA team # # Last update in 2004; does not respect LDFLAGS; hacky # ebuild; missing toolset to use it; basically abandoned # upstream. # # Removal on 2010-10-30 sys-auth/pam_pwdfile

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improve devaway system

2010-08-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 04:03:21 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > I'll fully admit that I neglected to remove my last .away until I > double-checked earlier today. apparently i'd left mine too since OLS -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] sys-libs/db and dll hell

2010-08-31 Thread Eray Aslan
Hi, app-crypt/heimdal looks for db header files in db4/db.h db3/db.h db.h db_185.h - in that order - and links with ldb. In Gentoo, we do not have a db4 directory but rather db3 db4.7 db4.8 db5.0 etc. Consequently, when both sys-libs/db-3 and sys-libs/db-4 are present, heimdal links against

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improve devaway system

2010-08-31 Thread Angelo Arrifano
On 31-08-2010 10:03, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:13:15PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote: >> Hello fellow developers. >> >> On 08/30/2010 04:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>> Sounds good to me, but I'd actually be more interested in having >>> something the other way around; i.e

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/db and dll hell

2010-08-31 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 07:27:57PM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote: > app-crypt/heimdal looks for db header files in db4/db.h db3/db.h db.h > db_185.h - in that order - and links with ldb. In Gentoo, we do not > have a db4 directory but rather db3 db4.7 db4.8 db5.0 etc. And the reason we don't have it,