Re: [gentoo-dev] Help on f-spot-0.8 problem

2010-10-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 02-10-2010 a las 21:36 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió: > Hi, Pacho. > > В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 20:14 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет: > > Since Calchan doesn't have much time for f-spot and dotnet team is > > conformed basically by me, I would welcome any help for trying to > > bump f-spot to its 0.8

Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files and their future on Gentoo

2010-10-02 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 02/10/2010 21:54, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto a écrit : > With that goal in mind, I'd like to ask anyone with arguments about this > issue to present them as a reply to this thread. [putting on my X11 cap] As far as X11 packages are concerned (libX11, libXext, cairo, etc), we can remove .la fil

[gentoo-dev] .la files and their future on Gentoo

2010-10-02 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. Given the recent activity around .la files and conflict about how to deal with them, I propose we discuss this issue in this mailing list, and take this issue to the council. That way, we can make a global decision, taking into account all the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-02 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 02/10/2010 в 10:43 -0700, Zac Medico пишет: > On 10/02/2010 05:21 AM, Peter Volkov wrote: > > Is it possible for portage-2.1.8.x to depend on lafilefixer and add run > > lafilefixer (if installed) from base profile bashrc? > We can do a portage-2.1.8.4 version bump with support for running

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/02/2010 05:21 AM, Peter Volkov wrote: > В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 12:38 -0700, Zac Medico пишет: >> Maybe advise them to use post_pkg_preinst instead of post_src_install, >> so it works even for binary packages. > > Is it possible for portage-2.1.8.x to depend on lafilefixer and add run > lafilefi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help on f-spot-0.8 problem

2010-10-02 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi, Pacho. В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 20:14 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет: > Since Calchan doesn't have much time for f-spot and dotnet team is > conformed basically by me, I would welcome any help for trying to > bump f-spot to its 0.8 version. The problem is that eautoreconf doesn't > run, even running "au

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-chemistry/validation

2010-10-02 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
# Andreas K. Huettel (02 Oct 2010) # Masking for removal in 30 days # Upstream is dead, does not build, would need massive work for current # gcc. Seems like nobody has missed it for some time. Bug 296651. sci-chemistry/validation -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-02 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 10/01/2010 09:12 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >>> >>> I don't think it makes much difference though to them — >>> >  beside making you feel righteous at dragging your feet. Nice try. >>> > >> >> I'm sorry, but I do not understand your hostili

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-02 Thread Luca Barbato
On 10/01/2010 09:12 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: I don't think it makes much difference though to them — > beside making you feel righteous at dragging your feet. Nice try. > I'm sorry, but I do not understand your hostility. Could you rephrase your objections with what I said in a way I can und

[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for net-nntp/nntpswitch

2010-10-02 Thread Diego E . Pettenò
# Diego E. Pettenò (02 Oct 2010) # on behalf of QA team # # Violate sandbox at least since July 2009 (bug #279090) # thus cannot install; ignores flags (bug #241090). # # Removal on 2010-12-01 net-nntp/nntpswitch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-02 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 20:02 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: > I, sincerely, have poured enough effort in trying to solve the issue, > discussing it, documenting it, showing how to deal with new packages, > showing how to identify pointless .la files that only increase the > number of them installed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-02 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 12:38 -0700, Zac Medico пишет: > Maybe advise them to use post_pkg_preinst instead of post_src_install, > so it works even for binary packages. Is it possible for portage-2.1.8.x to depend on lafilefixer and add run lafilefixer (if installed) from base profile bashrc? -- Pete

Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-02 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-10-2010 03:01, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 10:20 Sat 02 Oct , Alistair Bush wrote: >> How is this news item going to help ppl in a month from now (till the >> issue is solved in its entirety). Can we reasonably expect a new user >> to be aw

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

2010-10-02 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:47:38 +0530 > Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> >> A nice way around this is to do the following: >> >>     ls -1 | while read i; do >> >> `read` delimits on newline, so you're safe. > > This strips leading and trailing whitespace.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-02 Thread Dale
Duncan wrote: Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 03:06:56 +0200 as excerpted: Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 00.42 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan ha scritto: Right, so a few weeks later when they re-merge a binpkg, they suddenly get build failures again. And that confuses them si

Re: [gentoo-dev] issue with gentoo-x86 cvs repo

2010-10-02 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
Dne 2.10.2010 03:35, Robin H. Johnson napsal(a): > On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 03:19:42AM +0200, "Miroslav ?ulc (fordfrog)" wrote: >> hi, >> >> yesterday i was able to use the repo but now i get this error (for any >> cvs command): >> >> $ cvs rm -f apgdiff-2.0.2.ebuild >> Your account has expired; p