I've just created a tracker bug [1] and CC'd the affected maintainers.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344229
Best regards,
--
Rafael Goncalves Martins
Gentoo Linux developer
http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/
What will change and for whom?
In this mail (Table of contents)
Information for ...
- Everyone
- New public key file format
- Your real name
- Your mail address
- Nicknames
- SSH options
- Multiple keys
- Querying your permissions
- Repository owners
- Ove
Hey guys,
We're going to migrate our git.overlays.gentoo.org backend from gitosis
to gitolite.
It'll bring us new features, more flexibility and it's more robust. For
more details read my upcoming mail about it.
When: 2010/11/06 (Saturday) 15:00-16:00 UTC
Read/Write access to git.overlays.g.o wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-11-2010 18:34, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 09:13 PM, Olivier Galibert wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:03:13PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> # Samuli Suominen (04 Nov 2010)
>>> # Over 20 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/2wurbtz
>
On 11/04/2010 09:13 PM, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:03:13PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> # Samuli Suominen (04 Nov 2010)
>> # Over 20 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/2wurbtz
>> # Bugs assigned to a proxy maintainer without CVS access
>> # Every package outdated, bug 3400
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:03:13PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (04 Nov 2010)
> # Over 20 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/2wurbtz
> # Bugs assigned to a proxy maintainer without CVS access
> # Every package outdated, bug 340007
> # Removal in 30 days
The bug 340007 you're citin
On 04-11-2010 18:00:10 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
> I'm currently doing keywording of ebuilds for ~x86-interix prefix. Now
> my question is: what's the current policy about committing prefix
> keywords (and only keywords, no patches) to the gentoo-x86 tree.
> Should I check back with maintainers, as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 4.11.2010 18:40, Mark Loeser napsal(a):
> Please do remove the flag. The fact that there are some ebuilds in the
> tree that use it does not make it alright to introduce more.
>
> Thanks,
>
You should read cvs log first :)
I already did at the m
On 11/4/10 6:40 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Please do remove the flag. The fact that there are some ebuilds in the
> tree that use it does not make it alright to introduce more.
Yeah, the "he's doing that too" bad excuse...
But there is a right point in that: why QA doesn't just commit fixes to
the
Tomáš Chvátal said:
> Dne 4.11.2010 15:37, Jeremy Olexa napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:33:59 + (UTC), Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
> >> scarabeus10/11/04 14:33:59
> >>
> >> Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog quassel-.ebuild
> >> quassel-0.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 4.11.2010 15:37, Jeremy Olexa napsal(a):
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:33:59 + (UTC), Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
>> scarabeus10/11/04 14:33:59
>>
>> Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog quassel-.ebuild
>>
Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) :
> scarabeus 10/11/04 14:33:59
>
> Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog quassel-.ebuild
> quassel-0.7.1.ebuild
> Log:
> Introduce logrotate useflag.
>
Please don't! See http://bugs.gentoo.org/198901
--
Daniel Pielmeier
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:33:59 + (UTC), Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus)
wrote:
scarabeus10/11/04 14:33:59
Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog quassel-.ebuild
quassel-0.7.1.ebuild
Log:
Introduce logrotate useflag.
Please remove the logrotate useflag, i
13 matches
Mail list logo
