On 11/25/10 4:07 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
By following closely upstream development you are able to adapt the live
ebuild to the current status, eg, for new deps. Usually with vlc, when a new
major version comes out, there are a couple of new features and a couple of
outdated features
2010-11-27 14:00:28 Sebastian Pipping napisał(a):
On 11/14/10 17:28, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
So I plan to remove the call to eselect_python_update from all Python
ebuilds in two weeks from now.
Now fixed in both the main tree as well as the Python overlay.
Please let me know in case I
2010-11-16 00:41:35 Alex Alexander napisał(a):
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:40:44PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
Some updates to my suggestion:
- Files would optionally end with -${EAPI} suffix.
- The following files would be affected:
package.mask
2010-11-19 16:51:03 Zac Medico napisał(a):
On 10/25/2010 06:24 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
use.unsatisfiable and package.use.unsatisfiable files would cause that
`repoman` would treat
given USE flags in the same way as masked USE flags. These files wouldn't
affect
On 11/28/2010 10:15 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-11-19 16:51:03 Zac Medico napisał(a):
On 10/25/2010 06:24 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
use.unsatisfiable and package.use.unsatisfiable files would cause that
`repoman` would treat
given USE flags in the
2010-11-28 20:59:05 Zac Medico napisał(a):
On 11/28/2010 10:15 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-11-19 16:51:03 Zac Medico napisał(a):
On 10/25/2010 06:24 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
use.unsatisfiable and package.use.unsatisfiable files would cause that
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:32:16PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
I would like to introduce incompatible improvements in syntax of
PYTHON_DEPEND variable in
EAPI =4. The new syntax will depend on whether given package supports
installation for
multiple Python ABIs. The
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:32:16 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
PYTHON_DEPEND will be required. Otherwise each ${range_of_versions}
should be included between and markers.
Do we really need to introduce those ugly markers? AFAICS in all places
they're used
2010-11-28 21:15:15 Markos Chandras napisał(a):
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:32:16PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
I would like to introduce incompatible improvements in syntax of
PYTHON_DEPEND variable in
EAPI =4. The new syntax will depend on whether given package
On 11/28/2010 12:07 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-11-28 20:59:05 Zac Medico napisał(a):
It seems like you're trying to bypass an important function of repoman
though. The idea is that repoman is supposed to protect users from
experiencing unsatisfiable dependencies of
2010-11-28 21:20:31 Michał Górny napisał(a):
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:32:16 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
PYTHON_DEPEND will be required. Otherwise each ${range_of_versions}
should be included between and markers.
Do we really need to introduce
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:34:49 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-11-28 21:20:31 Michał Górny napisał(a):
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:32:16 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
PYTHON_DEPEND will be required. Otherwise
On 11/22/2010 05:30 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
Anyway, there's support for checking dependencies with empty KEYWORDS here:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=9ed6332f2015e41f072f897764f550c5574ea96f
This is included in =sys-apps/portage-2.1.9.25. Please try it and
2010-11-28 21:30:47 Zac Medico napisał(a):
On 11/28/2010 12:07 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-11-28 20:59:05 Zac Medico napisał(a):
It seems like you're trying to bypass an important function of repoman
though. The idea is that repoman is supposed to protect users from
On 11/28/2010 11:56 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
It seems like the problem here is that we don't have separate profiles
for stable and unstable keywords. The obvious solution would be to have
separate profiles, mask the flags in the stable profiles, and unmask the
flags in
On 28 Nov 2010, at 22:20, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:32:16 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
PYTHON_DEPEND will be required. Otherwise each ${range_of_versions}
should be included between and markers.
Do we really
Presently in package.mask, we have this entry:
# Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org (04 Jul 2010)
# Python 2.7 masked until sufficient number of reverse dependencies is fixed.
~dev-lang/python-2.7
Well Python 2.7.1 was committed today, and does NOT match this mask, so are
2010-11-29 01:26:19 Robin H. Johnson napisał(a):
Presently in package.mask, we have this entry:
# Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org (04 Jul 2010)
# Python 2.7 masked until sufficient number of reverse dependencies is fixed.
~dev-lang/python-2.7
Well Python 2.7.1 was
2010-11-29 01:24:50 Alex Alexander napisał(a):
On 28 Nov 2010, at 22:20, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:32:16 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
PYTHON_DEPEND will be required. Otherwise each ${range_of_versions}
should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/28/2010 08:48 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-11-29 01:24:50 Alex Alexander napisał(a):
On 28 Nov 2010, at 22:20, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:32:16 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
2010-11-29 02:54:14 Jonathan Callen napisał(a):
Just throwing this out as an option, instead of using , maybe {
}, which might be more readable (and isn't currently allowed at all in
*DEPEND.
I'm not sure if Thomas Sachau or somebody else wasn't planning to use {...}
in the future.
--
On 11/28/2010 02:15 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:32:16PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
I would like to introduce incompatible improvements in syntax of PYTHON_DEPEND
variable in
EAPI=4. The new syntax will depend on whether given package supports
On 11/28/10 19:04, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
You probably broke generation of stages :) .
(I have restored a minimal version of eselect_python_update() in python
overlay.)
Could you elaborate on that, please? How did I break stages? Which
stages? Future stage tarballs?
23 matches
Mail list logo
