On 2011.01.29 05:20, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
[snip] ...
and that whoever feels to be in place to
deal out QA (and I think this has gone wrong a few times recently) is
required to:
1) state and/or explain policy specifically where it is being not
adhered to;
2) offer alternatives where policy
On 28-01-2011 22:11:30 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
Please comment and help us improve the english of the whole document
so it gets accepted :)
(:Nread
On 01/29/2011 12:42 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Finally, if Devrel, QA, and the Council have already talked this out
and agree that QA is in the best place to police technical commit
issues, then pipe this email to /dev/null...
The diff proposed in this thread has not yet been talked about
El mié, 01-12-2010 a las 19:57 +0100, Thomas Sachau escribió:
Hi,
i have already written about this some months ago and updated the code in
relation to the comments
especially from vapier.
Basicly, it does now first set abi-specific vars (like CC, CFLAGS and others
(setup_abi_env
On 01/29/2011 07:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I would like to know what is blocking this from landing main tree in
the near future, as I reviewed:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg41737.html
and looks like there wasn't major problems (at least commented in this
thread)
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to know what is blocking this from landing main tree in
the near future, as I reviewed:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg41737.html
and looks like there wasn't major problems (at
El sáb, 29-01-2011 a las 13:10 -0500, Nathan Phillip Brink escribió:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to know what is blocking this from landing main tree in
the near future, as I reviewed:
Am 29.01.2011 19:30, schrieb Pacho Ramos:
El sáb, 29-01-2011 a las 13:10 -0500, Nathan Phillip Brink escribió:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to know what is blocking this from landing main tree in
the near future, as I reviewed:
El sáb, 29-01-2011 a las 19:56 +0100, Thomas Sachau escribió:
Am 29.01.2011 19:30, schrieb Pacho Ramos:
El sáb, 29-01-2011 a las 13:10 -0500, Nathan Phillip Brink escribió:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to know what is blocking this
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28-01-2011 22:11:30 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
Please comment and help us improve the english
Hello fellow devs,
We're pleased to announce that EAPI 4 is now available and allowed in
the main tree, in ~testing ebuilds :)
New features in EAPI 4 include REQUIRED_USE, pkg_pretend, REPLACING_VERSIONS
and REPLACED_BY_VERSION and various other interesting changes and fixes.
To find out more
11 matches
Mail list logo
