Ryan Hill posted on Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:11:12 -0600 as excerpted:
> You may also want to test your packages with the new -Ofast option to
> be sure it doesn't have any hardcoded assumptions about -O flags.
The release description I've read for -Ofast says it includes -fast-math,
among other
I just added 4.6.0 to the tree. We probably won't be unmasking it any time
soon (after 4.6.1 for sure), but please start testing your packages now so we
can get things rolling.
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html
For general testing you may want to add the gcc-porting overlay to avoid
known
On 4/2/11 7:08 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:22 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> On 3/27/11 1:13 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>>> I'd like to suggest removing "digest" from the line above. I've been
>>> running with the developer profile and -digest in /etc/make.conf, and
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 16:41 -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Saturday, April 02, 2011 07:02:54 AM Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
> > On 3/31/11 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > > Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need
> > > to specify the version.
> >
> > Thank you, but
On Saturday, April 02, 2011 07:02:54 AM Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
> On 3/31/11 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need
> > to specify the version.
>
> Thank you, but it's still not enough for chromium. The virtual uses
>
> >=ffmpeg-0
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:22 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/27/11 1:13 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> I'd like to suggest removing "digest" from the line above. I've been
>> running with the developer profile and -digest in /etc/make.conf, and
>> everything is working fine.
>
> Are there
On 3/27/11 1:13 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> I'd like to suggest removing "digest" from the line above. I've been
> running with the developer profile and -digest in /etc/make.conf, and
> everything is working fine.
Are there any objections against doing the above?
Christos (angelos), Mike (v
On 3/31/11 9:37 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Ok two versioned virtuals (0.5 0.6) are now in the tree if people need
> to specify the version.
Thank you, but it's still not enough for chromium. The virtual uses
>=ffmpeg-0.6, and chromium is known to be broken with =ffmpeg-0.6_p25767, not just 0.6.
B
