Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/aria2: aria2-1.12.0.ebuild ChangeLog

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01-07-2011 19:33, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 07/01/11 21:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > [SNIP] >> If we use EAPI 4 in that ebuild we cannot make it stable anytime soon, >> correct? > > As far as I'm aware we have a stable portage with EAPI 4 in th

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

Rich Freeman posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:50:28 -0400 as excerpted: > I wonder if there is a way to get around keeping cruft in the tree for > the sake of those who don't update often. > > Something that comes to mind is having a binpkg repository for > everything in system - essentially a binpk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > You're very correct about portage getting confused if the existing > packages are outdated, since the tarball would be dropping in untracked > files.  At least in the past, portage wouldn't unmerge glibc or the like, > but it ce

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

Duncan posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:26:58 + as excerpted: > Patrick Lauer posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:45:16 +0200 as excerpted: > >> [Keeping an up and running system during a reinstall is] not as easy >> as it could be. > Can't disagree there. =:^) ... And upon further thought, can't di

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/aria2: aria2-1.12.0.ebuild ChangeLog

On 07/01/11 21:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote: [SNIP] > If we use EAPI 4 in that ebuild we cannot make it stable anytime soon, > correct? As far as I'm aware we have a stable portage with EAPI 4 in the tree for a few weeks now, so you can actively use it everywhere. -- Patrick Lauer http:/

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: gentoo base functions

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:44, William Hubbs wrote: > this is a followup thread to the one about openrc being mandatory on all > gentoo systems. > > I started a new thread, because I want to figure out which > functions located in /etc/init.d/functions.sh need to be available > regardless of the ini

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/aria2: aria2-1.12.0.ebuild ChangeLog

On 07/01/2011 10:03 AM, Peter Volkov wrote: > В Чтв, 30/06/2011 в 19:27 +, Sebastian Pipping (sping) пишет: >> Log: >> net-misc/aria2: Bump to 1.12.0, looks trivial >> >> EAPI="2" >> >> inherit bash-completion > ... >> pkg_setup() { >> if use scripts && use !xmlrpc && use !metalink; t

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

William Hubbs wrote: On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:08:53AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 11:26 Fri 01 Jul , Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: Except for the fact that while you upgrade, you still have a usable system. Reinstallation means a massive time-sink during which your machine is com

[gentoo-dev] rfc: gentoo base functions

All, this is a followup thread to the one about openrc being mandatory on all gentoo systems. I started a new thread, because I want to figure out which functions located in /etc/init.d/functions.sh need to be available regardless of the init system in use. So far, I'm thinking this is the list:

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:08:53AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 11:26 Fri 01 Jul , Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > Except for the fact that while you upgrade, you still have a usable > > system. Reinstallation means a massive time-sink during which your > > machine is completely unusable. T

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

On 11:26 Fri 01 Jul , Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > Except for the fact that while you upgrade, you still have a usable > system. Reinstallation means a massive time-sink during which your > machine is completely unusable. This is not an option for a lot of > people. > > If -user is regularly g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/aria2: aria2-1.12.0.ebuild ChangeLog

В Птн, 01/07/2011 в 09:09 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: > On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:03:41 +0400 > Peter Volkov wrote: > > > pkg_setup() { > > > if use scripts && use !xmlrpc && use !metalink; then > > > > This really calls for REQUIRED_USE from EAPI="4". > > > > REQUIRED_USE="scripts? ( ^^ ( xmlr

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: app-text/notecase

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (1 Jul 2011) # Dead upstream. Does not build against # >x11-libs/gktsourceview-2.10. Bug #314779 # Masked for removal in 30 days app-text/notecase - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEG

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, William Hubbs wrote: >> We have a policy on this, see >> : >> >> | Upgrade path for old systems >> | >> | Vote (unanimous): The ebuild tree must provide an upgrade path

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 08:38:38AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, William Hubbs wrote: > > > Please discuss. Did I leave out any steps? Are there any points I > > have left out besides the time window between steps 2 and 3? Should > > there be a time window before removi

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

Patrick Lauer posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:45:16 +0200 as excerpted: >> So keeping an up and running machine even with a reinstall isn't a >> problem, certainly no more of one than fighting with broken installs, >> because everything has changed out from under the existing one. > > It's not as e

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-crypt/steghid

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (1 Jul 2011) # Does not build against gcc-4.5. Bug #319679 # Masked for removal in 30 days app-crypt/steghid - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: app-emulation/gdb-armulator

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (1 Jul 2011) # Does not build against gcc-4.5. Bug #320337. # Masked for removal in 30 days app-emulation/pearpc - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Gnu

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/gdb-armulator

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (1 Jul 2011) # Does not respect LDFLAGS (bug #333505). # The core functionality has been replaced by # app-emulation/qemu # Masked for removal in 30 days app-emulation/gdb-armulator - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux De

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-apps/pcmcia-cs*

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (1 Jul 2011) # The whole suite seems abandoned. # QA and compilation problems ( bug #236286 ). # Has been replaced by sys-apps/pcmciautils # Masked for removal in 30 days sys-apps/pcmcia-cs sys-apps/pcmcia-cs-cis sys-apps/pcmcia-cs

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: net-libs/clinkcc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (1 Jul 2011) # Does not build against gcc-4.5. Bug #323061 # Masked for removal in 30 days net-libs/clinkcc - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-arch/upm

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (1 Jul 2011) # Dead upstream, no updates since 2002. Does not build # against glibc-2.14 ( bug #371157 ). Masked for removal # in 30 days app-arch/upm - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

On 07/01/11 11:25, Duncan wrote: > Nirbheek Chauhan posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:26:50 +0530 as excerpted: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dale wrote: >>> William Hubbs wrote: >>> As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as >>> well reinstall anyway. That is usua

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

Nirbheek Chauhan posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:26:50 +0530 as excerpted: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dale wrote: >> William Hubbs wrote: >> As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as >> well reinstall anyway.  That is usually the advice given on -user. >>  After

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/aria2: aria2-1.12.0.ebuild ChangeLog

On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:03:41 +0400 Peter Volkov wrote: > > pkg_setup() { > > if use scripts && use !xmlrpc && use !metalink; then > > This really calls for REQUIRED_USE from EAPI="4". > > REQUIRED_USE="scripts? ( ^^ ( xmlrpc metalink ) )" That's not the same condition as the one in the pkg_

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/aria2: aria2-1.12.0.ebuild ChangeLog

В Чтв, 30/06/2011 в 19:27 +, Sebastian Pipping (sping) пишет: > Log: > net-misc/aria2: Bump to 1.12.0, looks trivial > > EAPI="2" > > inherit bash-completion ... > pkg_setup() { > if use scripts && use !xmlrpc && use !metalink; then > ewarn "Please also enable the 'xml

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

On 07/01/11 07:56, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dale wrote: >> William Hubbs wrote: >> As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as well >> reinstall anyway. That is usually the advice given on -user. After a year >> without updating, it is