Samuli Suominen wrote:
> eclass has ChangeLog file now. any particular reason why you skipped it?
Completely oblivious to its existence, that's all :) I'll
(hopefully) remember it next time.
> or is it not meant to be used yet / not mandatory to use yet? since most
> people seem to skip it.
I
# Samuli Suominen (28 Nov 2011)
# Masked for removal in 30 days because of bugs 380193 and 381227
dev-perl/Gtk2-Sexy
net-misc/twitux
eclass has ChangeLog file now. any particular reason why you skipped it?
or is it not meant to be used yet / not mandatory to use yet? since most
people seem to skip it.
- Samuli
On 11/28/2011 08:13 PM, Jim Ramsay (lack) wrote:
> lack11/11/28 18:13:42
>
> Modified: vim.e
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 17:25 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't
> > have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer:
> > app-portage/autounmask
> > app-portage/demerge
>
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Have you considered time overhead of moving files in unnatural order?
Rather than re-discuss this point it would probably be better for
everybody to just read through the entire thread again, particularly
Cirian's post and its follow-ups. My
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 23:28:12 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2011-11-26 11:58:22 Fabian Groffen napisał(a):
> > On 26-11-2011 01:54:35 +, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> > wrote:
> > > commit: 1d4ac47c28706094230cb2c4e6ee1c1c71629aa0
> > > T> Org>
> > > AuthorDate