[gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application name) to packages. Say, they bind libreoffice-writer to LibreOffice Writer in package metadata. How about expanding metadata.xml (adding to its

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application name) to packages. Say, they bind libreoffice-writer to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name

[gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

2012-02-11 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
We have 2 files in gentoo-x86 with slightly out-of-sync data: profiles/arch/amd64/no-multilib/package.mask profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask They both essentially block x86-only stuff. AFAIU profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask should contain bits, which are

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

2012-02-11 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/11/2012 02:38 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: We have 2 files in gentoo-x86 with slightly out-of-sync data: profiles/arch/amd64/no-multilib/package.mask profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask They both essentially block

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

2012-02-11 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 AFAIK features/64bit-native is for other 64-bit arches too like ia64 and ppc64. So we can't really drop this. And we can't drop the per-arch 64bit file because if a package does not work on ia64 it does not mean that it doesn't work on amd64

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

2012-02-11 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
[ CCed gentoo-harde...@lists.gentoo.org to warn against possible breakage. Touching profiles make me nervous. TS: http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_7c41ab6653426048c2e8b0f271637bf3.xml ] Looks like 'arch/amd64/no-multilib' profile inclusion is kept in sync with

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

2012-02-11 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
Looks like 'arch/amd64/no-multilib' profile inclusion is kept in sync with 'features/64bit-native' one: [1]. Exception is 'hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib' profile. Looks like a bug. Synced this bit with a fix: | 11 Feb 2012; Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org |

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-php/pecl-idn dev-php/pecl-enchant

2012-02-11 Thread Ole Markus With
# Ole Markus With olemar...@gentoo.org (11 Feb 2012) # Made obsolete by PHP 5.3. Bugs #402862, #402865. # Masked for removal on 11 Mar 2012 dev-php/pecl-idn dev-php/pecl-enchant signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/02/12 08:27 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly