On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:47:01 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> > Post the description so we can bikeshed it to death.
> You got me. I did not post it on purpose to avoid all the bikeshedding
> for no reason. The flag is now global so the description is:
;)
> ayatana - Build in support for Ayatan
# Bernard Cafarelli (14 Feb 2012)
# Does not compile with new Objective-C runtimes
# Dead upstreams (last releases in 2002, 2005 or 2006)
# Removal in a month, bug #380433
gnustep-libs/objcunit
gnustep-apps/cynthiune
gnustep-apps/gridlock
gnustep-apps/talksoup
--
Bernard Cafarelli (Voyageur)
Gen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/14/2012 06:17 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:44:41 + Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>
>> Just a heads up. There are more than 5 packages using the
>> 'ayatana' use flag so I will add it to global use flags in 48
>> hours.
>
> Po
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
> I would like to write an ebuild for some software that is CeDILL-1.1
> licensed, but the license is not in the portage tree. The CeDILL-2
> license is in the portage tree.
If this is just going in an overlay, you can simply add it to the
licen
El lun, 13-02-2012 a las 16:06 -0600, Dale escribió:
> "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > On 2/13/12 11:55 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >> El jue, 09-02-2012 a las 12:41 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> >>> Hello
> >>>
> >>> Looks like our net-misc/mDNSResponder packages are orphan and
> >>> unmaintained for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to clarify that this is the CeCILL-1.1 license and the
license in tree is CeCILL-2.
On 02/14/12 03:14, Richard Yao wrote:
>
> I would like to write an ebuild for some software that is CeDILL-1.1
> licensed, but the license is not in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to write an ebuild for some software that is CeDILL-1.1
licensed, but the license is not in the portage tree. The CeDILL-2
license is in the portage tree.
I had a chat with robbat in #gentoo-dev on freenode about importing this
license i
