On 25/03/12 20:56, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> On 28/02/12 22:13, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>> If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will add
>> this
>> to portage (after finishing remaining TODO items, PyPy requires 4G of
>> RAM(!!)).
>
> Hello,
>
> Slightly late due to
On 25/03/12 20:56, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> On 28/02/12 22:13, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>> If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will add
>> this
>> to portage (after finishing remaining TODO items, PyPy requires 4G of
>> RAM(!!)).
>
> Hello,
>
> Slightly late due to
On 26/03/12 09:21, justin wrote:
> On 25/03/12 20:56, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>> On 28/02/12 22:13, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>>> If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will add
>>> this
>>> to portage (after finishing remaining TODO items, PyPy requires 4G of
>>> RAM(!!)
On 26/03/12 09:20, justin wrote:
> On 25/03/12 20:56, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>> On 28/02/12 22:13, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>>> If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will add
>>> this
>>> to portage (after finishing remaining TODO items, PyPy requires 4G of
>>> RAM(!!)
On 26/03/12 18:11, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> On 26/03/12 09:20, justin wrote:
>> On 25/03/12 20:56, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>>> On 28/02/12 22:13, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will add
this
to portage (after finishing rema
If you wonder why I stopped filing new stabilization request, the
pybugz-based script that was filing those bugs started failing.
I have added some debugging statements to see what's going on, and
here's what https://bugs.gentoo.org says as a response to pybugz's
request to create a new bug:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
>
> Any ideas?
>
I'm guessing it was broken by the upgrade from Bugzilla 4.0 to Bugzilla 4.2.
I th
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> wrote:
>> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
>> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>
> I'm guessing it
Hello, I would appreciate if those of you with portage development experience
and a moment to spare could please take a look at:
https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygdll_protect.patch
Not gunning for upstream or anything, but I woul
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> Hello, I would appreciate if those of you with portage development experience
> and a moment to spare could please take a look at:
>
> https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygd
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Gregory M. Turner
> wrote:
> > https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygdll_protect.patch
> Consistency in the style would be nice.
>
> For instance in cygdll-update:
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
