On 04/22/2012 06:25 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
systemd and udev are being merged into one tarball. For the foreseeable
future, it will still build 2 separate binaries. What happens down the
road if/when it all becomes one combined binary?
If becomes a problem, then it will be dealt with.
On 22-04-2012 21:25:40 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
BTW, how would a non-programmer (at least not C programmer) like me
forward these ideas to the Gentoo Council?
Make sure you post pointers, with preferably a clear question, in reply
to the next call for agenda items (this Tuesday).
--
I don't really think this is necessary, but some people seem to.
Looks fine?
- Samuli
Title: The default JPEG implementation is libjpeg-turbo
Author: Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2012-04-23
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I don't really think this is necessary, but some people seem to.
Looks fine?
Title: The default JPEG implementation is libjpeg-turbo
Too long. GLEP 42 allows a maximum of 44 characters only.
Author: Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
On 04/23/2012 01:43 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I don't really think this is necessary, but some people seem to.
Looks fine?
Title: The default JPEG implementation is libjpeg-turbo
Too long. GLEP 42 allows a maximum of 44 characters only.
On 04/23/12 06:16, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I don't really think this is necessary, but some people seem to.
Looks fine?
- Samuli
What is the plan for platforms that are not supported by libturbo?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
What is the plan for platforms that are not supported by libturbo?
It's not that they're not supported, just that libjpeg-turbo doesn't
have optimized routines for them. It'll still run fine. (Check the
keywords, you'll
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as excerpted:
Title: The default JPEG implementation
[...]
All users are recommended to migrate:
# emerge -C media-libs/jpeg:0
# emerge -1 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo
That of course leaves the system without a jpeg library between
On 04/23/2012 02:58 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
On 04/23/12 06:16, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I don't really think this is necessary, but some people seem to.
Looks fine?
- Samuli
What is the plan for platforms that are not supported by libturbo?
Matt's reply is accurate.
On 04/23/2012 03:28 PM, Duncan wrote:
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as excerpted:
Title: The default JPEG implementation
[...]
All users are recommended to migrate:
# emerge -C media-libs/jpeg:0
# emerge -1 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo
There's no way to use
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/23/2012 03:28 PM, Duncan wrote:
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as excerpted:
Title: The default JPEG implementation
[...]
All users are recommended to migrate:
# emerge -C
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as excerpted:
Title: The default JPEG implementation
[...]
All users are recommended to migrate:
# emerge -C media-libs/jpeg:0
# emerge -1
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:04:54PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote
On 04/22/2012 06:25 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
BTW, how would a non-programmer (at least not C programmer) like me
forward these ideas to the Gentoo Council?
You'll see an email on this list a week or two before the next council
El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 10:17 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as excerpted:
Title: The default JPEG implementation
[...]
All users are recommended to migrate:
On 04/23/2012 10:49 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 10:17 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Duncan1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as excerpted:
Title: The default JPEG implementation
[...]
Am 23.04.2012 19:49, schrieb Pacho Ramos:
El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 10:17 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net
wrote:
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as
excerpted:
Title: The default JPEG implementation
[...]
On 04/23/2012 11:03 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Am 23.04.2012 19:49, schrieb Pacho Ramos:
El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 10:17 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Duncan1i5t5.dun...@cox.net
wrote:
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as
excerpted:
Our stable versions are broken for a long time, they even don't compile,
but we cannot stable latest testing version because of a buffer overflow
problem. A bump could help, but looks like embedded team doesn't have
enough time for it. Is anybody interested in taking care of it?
Its bugs:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:22:53PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
All users are recommended to migrate:
# emerge -C media-libs/jpeg:0
# emerge -1 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo
How about mentioning revdep-rebuild in the instructions?
--
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
Matt Turner schrieb:
It's not that they're not supported, just that libjpeg-turbo doesn't
have optimized routines for them. It'll still run fine. (Check the
keywords, you'll see that it's stabilized.)
And on those platforms it will run equally fast or faster or slower?
Best regards,
On Monday 23 April 2012 15:19:31 Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:22:53PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
All users are recommended to migrate:
# emerge -C media-libs/jpeg:0
# emerge -1 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo
How about mentioning revdep-rebuild in the instructions?
no
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing
users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run
eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but
sometimes users have patches which touch autoconf files but my
existing patch set doesn't so I'm not
On 24 April 2012 09:15, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing
users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run
eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but
sometimes users have patches
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:36 -0500
Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing
users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run
eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but
sometimes users have
On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote:
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing
users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run
eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but
sometimes users have patches which touch
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 06:05 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:36 -0500
Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing
users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run
eautoreconf. I don't
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:14:15 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 06:05 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:36 -0500
Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for
allowing
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:15:45 Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:10:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote:
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing
users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:18:59 Michał Górny wrote:
It's simply better just to assume: if user wants user patches, he/she
needs to have necessary deps installed.
if the package doesn't ever run autotools itself, i think this assumption is
fine. set AUTOTOOLS_AUTO_DEPEND=no before inherting
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote:
So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing
users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run
eautoreconf. I don't necessarily
30 matches
Mail list logo
