On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:08:34 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
On 29 April 2012 18:11, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it
runs pkg- config when
On 30 April 2012 02:16, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:08:34 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
On 29 April 2012 18:11, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've added a new USE=sep-usr flag to busybox. when enabled, this
will install a static busybox at /ginit (and have the other busybox
paths symlink to that so there's no overhead). this new applet has a
hand written set of commands to automatically
Hello,
Since lately Gentoo devs force you to replace collision-protect with
protect-owned [1] and sometimes packages just spit out files randomly
on the filesystem due to random errors, I thought it may be a good idea
to provide a new feature limiting the locations where packages can
install.
In
On 30/04/12 05:31, William Hubbs wrote:
Correction here; as far as I know the council did not mandate
separate /usr without initramfs. They just said that separate /usr
is a supported configuration.
Separate /usr is a supported configuration, which blocks the armwaving
about oh just use an
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
Since lately Gentoo devs force you to replace collision-protect with
protect-owned [1] and sometimes packages just spit out files randomly
on the filesystem due to random errors, I thought it may be a good idea
to provide a new feature limiting the
On 30/04/12 10:12, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
Since lately Gentoo devs force you to replace collision-protect with
protect-owned [1] and sometimes packages just spit out files randomly
on the filesystem due to random errors, I thought it may be a good idea
On 30/04/12 08:57, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
Since lately Gentoo devs force you to replace collision-protect with
protect-owned [1] and sometimes packages just spit out files randomly
on the filesystem due to random errors, I thought it may be a good idea
to provide a new feature limiting
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
On 30/04/12 10:12, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
If the eclass doesn't work with FEATURES=collision-protect then it
needs to be fixed.
Long story short: older eclass compiled Python byte code in live
file system, new one does it in src_install so
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:23:03 +0200
Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/04/12 10:12, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
Since lately Gentoo devs force you to replace collision-protect
with protect-owned [1] and sometimes packages just spit out files
On 30/04/12 11:30, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:24:58 +0200
Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/04/12 08:57, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
Since lately Gentoo devs force you to replace collision-protect with
protect-owned [1] and sometimes packages just spit out
Hello
Please remember to make your bugs related with glib-2.32/gtk+-3.4 issues
block bug 406437. That will allow us to get needed things stabilized in
the future when we stabilize newer glib/gtk+
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 30/04/12 10:39, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
On 30/04/12 10:12, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
If the eclass doesn't work with FEATURES=collision-protect then it
needs to be fixed.
Long story short: older eclass compiled Python byte code in live
file
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:37:53 +0200
Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/04/12 11:28, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:23:03 +0200
Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/04/12 10:12, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:40:26 +0200
Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/04/12 11:30, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:24:58 +0200
Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/04/12 08:57, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
Since lately Gentoo devs force you to
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:42:56 +0200
Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org wrote:
so the package *has to overwrite* files that are not owned by
anyone (no package owns them).
The usual approach to this problem was to have some cleanup code in
pkg_setup or pkg_preinst that would remove the
Hi all,
this is just a friendly reminder: please *always* block bug reports
related to packages failing with gcc against proper tracker bugs[1][2].
They are aliased as 'gcc-4.x' to make your life easier.
This greatly decreases amount of work required for later
stabilization/keywording. TIA!
On 30/04/12 11:47, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:40:26 +0200
Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/04/12 11:30, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:24:58 +0200
Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/04/12 08:57, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
On 04/30/2012 11:50 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
Hi all,
this is just a friendly reminder: please *always* block bug reports
related to packages failing with gcc against proper tracker bugs[1][2].
They are aliased as 'gcc-4.x' to make your life easier.
This greatly decreases amount of work
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 05:00, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
this is all in busybox-1.20.0 which is now in the tree. if people want to try
it out before i unmask it, that'd be great.
If you insist on calling other applets from C instead of using OS
functions, there is still no need
Krzysztof Pawlik schrieb:
On 30/04/12 10:39, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
On 30/04/12 10:12, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
If the eclass doesn't work with FEATURES=collision-protect then it
needs to be fixed.
Long story short: older eclass compiled Python byte
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Thomas Sachau wrote:
Krzysztof Pawlik schrieb:
On 30/04/12 10:39, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
If the eclass doesn't work with FEATURES=collision-protect
then it needs to be fixed.
Long story short: older eclass compiled Python byte code in live
file system, new one does it
On Monday 30 April 2012 01:28:58 William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:48:55AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
it leaves your system in a hard to recover state because you happened to
forget to check a filesystem option (which ironically isn't under
Filesystems in the kernel). it's
On Monday 30 April 2012 02:34:18 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've added a new USE=sep-usr flag to busybox. when enabled, this
will install a static busybox at /ginit (and have the other busybox
paths symlink to that so there's no overhead). this new
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Tony Chainsaw Vroon
chain...@gentoo.org wrote:
Binaries that are essential for system boot, and must be available in
single user mode go in /bin and /sbin, with their libraries in /lib.
This allows for /usr to be:
1) marked read-only for NFS mounts, which some
On Monday 30 April 2012 06:35:20 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 05:00, Mike Frysinger wrote:
this is all in busybox-1.20.0 which is now in the tree. if people want
to try it out before i unmask it, that'd be great.
If you insist on calling other applets from C instead of
On Monday 30 April 2012 02:16:40 Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:08:34 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
I'd just like to say, i'm also an Atheme project member and I have
authorisation from nenolod (the primary pkgconf developer)
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote:
doing it wrong. I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark,
or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source
and distribute a favored binary-only derivative.
err, they distribute a Chromium source tarball, and
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 02:34:18 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've added a new USE=sep-usr flag to busybox. when enabled, this
will install a static busybox at /ginit (and have the other busybox
paths symlink
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote:
doing it wrong. I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark,
or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source
and distribute a favored
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:14:19 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 02:34:18 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've added a new USE=sep-usr flag to busybox. when enabled, this
will install a static
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:14:19 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
i've added a new USE=sep-usr flag to busybox. when enabled, this
will install a static busybox at /ginit (and have the other busybox
paths symlink to that so there's no overhead). this new
On 04/29/2012 09:45 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 15.04.2012 17:12, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 16:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's currently
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 19:03, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i don't know what you mean by OS functions, but the whole point is that this
code *cannot* execute *any* external program by default.
I meant calling mount(2) directly instead of executing Busybox's
mount applet, etc. First
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:32:35 Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote:
doing it wrong. I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark,
or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their
On Monday 30 April 2012 13:16:52 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 19:03, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i don't know what you mean by OS functions, but the whole point is that
this code *cannot* execute *any* external program by default.
I meant calling mount(2) directly instead of
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:32:35 Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote:
doing it wrong. I don't like how Google develops Android
El lun, 30-04-2012 a las 10:05 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 04/29/2012 09:45 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 15.04.2012 17:12, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 16:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 20:32, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i don't think it's a big deal ... busybox generally aims to be compatible with
the utils it replaces, so if there's bugs/missing stuff, file a bug to get it
added.
I did file a couple, and never heard back. Although you are
On 04/30/2012 01:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to enable a
lighter alternative for
On 30 April 2012 14:27, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/30/2012 01:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs
pkg-
config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
for our normal systems, this isn't a big
On 04/29/2012 02:42 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 29-04-2012 a las 13:54 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 04/28/2012 01:17 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
According to upstreams homepage [1],
the current tagged v1.99.09 does support xulrunner 11.0.
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:11:58 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it
runs pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to
enable a lighter
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 22:00 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
[...]
The answer I got from Gentoo's Mozilla Team when I proposed bumping it
to latest from the Firefox tarball was that use npapi-sdk or
spidermonkey instead.
Some which have needed more than just npapi-sdk or spidermonkey have
On 04/30/2012 10:27 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 22:00 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
[...]
The answer I got from Gentoo's Mozilla Team when I proposed bumping it
to latest from the Firefox tarball was that use npapi-sdk or
spidermonkey instead.
Some which have needed more
On 04/30/2012 10:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:11:58 -0400
Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it
runs pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
for our normal systems, this isn't a big
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:00:59PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Tony Chainsaw Vroon
chain...@gentoo.org wrote:
Binaries that are essential for system boot, and must be available in
single user mode go in /bin and /sbin, with their libraries in /lib.
This
On Monday 30 April 2012 15:42:35 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/30/2012 10:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:11:58 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it
runs pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
On Monday 30 April 2012 14:27:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
+1 for creating the virtual and migrating the tree to use
virtual/pkgconfig. although, on the otherhand, you could just use
package.provided for thesetype of unsupported experiments (like i'm
doing with pkgconfig-openbsd)
ok, with no one
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:00:26PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote
i've added a new USE=sep-usr flag to busybox. when enabled, this
will install a static busybox at /ginit (and have the other busybox
paths symlink to that so there's no overhead). this new applet has
a hand written set of
On Monday 30 April 2012 22:57:29 Walter Dnes wrote:
The one thing I'm leary of is moving the actual app from /bin/busybox
to /ginit. IANACP (I Am Not A C Programmer), let alone a developer, so
I may be missing something. Is there an overwhelming reason to depart
from the standard location
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:03:48 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2012 06:35:20 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
there is still no need to mount /proc and parse
/proc/mounts in order to find out whether a directory is a mount
point, since Busybox has a mountpoint applet (and of course, one
52 matches
Mail list logo
