On 19/08/2012 20:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> gnutls is not valid and i will not wait for it. boost i'll give the
> maintainer time to resolve as the patch to boost-1.49 can be made to work,
> but
> it's not that great, and there are already plans on moving boost-1.50 to
> unstable which is all
On Sunday 19 August 2012 04:41:17 Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 8/18/12 5:31 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i'll probably land it later this weekend/monday.
>
> Would be nice having a list of bugs open so people might have a look and
> see if there is something big left.
we've been making trackers for
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-08-19 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-laptop/omnibook 2012-08-14 16:48:36 hwoarang
games-strategy/openxcom 2012-08-15 18:11:16 mr_bones_
dev-ruby/ruby-activeldap
On 8/18/2012 5:50 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 2012-08-17, at 11:00 PM, "Gregory M. Turner" wrote:
greg@fedora64vmw /tmp $ mkdir foo
greg@fedora64vmw /tmp $ ROOT=foo portageq envvar ROOT
/tmp/foo/
Does /anybody/ use this feature?
Sorry for the HTML response... am on the road.
I do
On 8/18/12 5:31 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'll probably land it later this weekend/monday.
Would be nice having a list of bugs open so people might have a look and
see if there is something big left.
boost and gnutls seem big enough already to spend some time to get those
fixed before unlea
