On 27/08/12 04:52, Diego Petteno (flameeyes) wrote:
flameeyes12/08/27 01:52:43
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:gpa-0.9.3.ebuild
Removed: gpa-0.9.1_pre20100416-r1.ebuild
Log:
Version bump (thanks to Arfrever in bug #432636 for reporting).
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:18:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF
works for this
As far as ebuilds are concerned, there is no such thing as EXTRA_ECONF.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 27/08/12 10:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:18:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF
works for this
As far as ebuilds are concerned, there is no such thing as EXTRA_ECONF.
you mean to say
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:01:28 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 27/08/12 10:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:18:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF
works for this
As
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:10:20 +0100 as excerpted:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:01:28 +0300 Samuli Suominen
ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 27/08/12 10:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:18:17 +0300 Samuli Suominen
ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
why leave the
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:45:45 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 22:45 -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:43:32 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
The variables that vala_pkg_setup sets are needed only at build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/08/12 04:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
The bottom line here is: I don't think all of the services we have
set up to need net in their default configuration should be set
up that way. It would make OpenRC work out of the box for many
more
Third update; Alexis made a convincing argument that vala_pkg_setup
should be changed to vala_src_prepare.
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: vala.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# gn...@gentoo.org
# @AUTHOR:
#
On 27/08/2012 00:18, Samuli Suominen wrote:
why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF works
for this
Because extremely simply I forgot to delete the line.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description:
Hello,
$ quse -D adns ares
global:adns: Adds support for the adns DNS client library
local:ares:dev-libs/ecore: Enables support for asynchronous DNS using the
net-dns/c-ares library
local:ares:net-analyzer/wireshark: Use GNU net-dns/c-ares library to resolve
DNS names
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:28:45 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
not a problem for users of the official package manager.
Cut it out. The Council makes the rules, not you, and the Council
says that PMS, not what works with one particular Portage version,
dictates what ebuilds
Right now, it just contains the function Tiziano listed in his post[1].
I'd appreciate further ideas, feedback, and possibly an example from
someone who will actually need it.
---
gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass | 43 ++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:19:28 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
+ has ${EAPI:-0} 0 1 2 ! use prefix EPREFIX=
Until EAPI 5 is available with support for IUSE_IMPLICIT, if you 'use
prefix', then prefix has to be listed in IUSE.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:23:31 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:19:28 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
+ has ${EAPI:-0} 0 1 2 ! use prefix EPREFIX=
Until EAPI 5 is available with support for IUSE_IMPLICIT, if you 'use
prefix',
Am Dienstag, 28. August 2012, 00:19:28 schrieb Michał Górny:
Right now, it just contains the function Tiziano listed in his post[1].
I'd appreciate further ideas, feedback, and possibly an example from
someone who will actually need it.
How about a function that just outputs the entire
Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the package
supports it?
It seems some developers don't care about this option. What's the gentoo
policy on this? Isn't this actually a bug?
On 27/08/2012 17:15, hasufell wrote:
Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the package
supports it?
Most libtool software supports static-libs, because libtool let you
build them, _but_ it might not be test or might not even work.
One example is software that relies on
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 02:15 +0200, hasufell wrote:
Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the package
supports it?
It seems some developers don't care about this option. What's the gentoo
policy on this? Isn't this actually a bug?
For example, static linking is
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:33:42 +0100 as excerpted:
No, you're utterly missing the point here. The spec is there to be
followed, not battled and ignored unless a justification is provided at
every step. When it comes to writing compliant ebuilds, PMS *is* the
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
That's all I'm saying. It's being made a whole lot less pleasant that it
might be... for what reason? Just to satisfy someone's ego that they're
right and can /force/ compliance? Yuck!
Honestly, while I might agree with
2012-08-28 00:19:28 Michał Górny napisał(a):
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
+# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
+# $Header: $
+
+if [[ ! ${_BOOST_ECLASS} ]]; then
+
+# @ECLASS:
Rich Freeman posted on Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:25:53 -0400 as excerpted:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
[snip]
Honestly, while I might agree with that sentiment on some of these
threads, my only complaint with Ciaran's original response was that he
could
On 27/08/12 16:46, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 27/08/2012 00:18, Samuli Suominen wrote:
why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF works
for this
Because extremely simply I forgot to delete the line.
yep, as I guessed, thanks for clearing it (and just ignore rest of
23 matches
Mail list logo
