On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:45:22 +0200
Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> The aim would be to get rid of built_with_use not only in a distant
> future. The corresponding bug [1] is from 2009 and can't be fixed
... without something like "increasing EAPI baseline".
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:41:14 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:10:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 September 2012 03:51:04 Brian Harring wrote:
> > > + if ! has $EAPI 0 1 2 3; then
> > > + eqawarn "built_with_use should not be used in
> > > $EAPI; u
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 06:52 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> Folks-
>
> Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
> proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
>
> The live version of the doc is available at
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 16 September 2012 23:40, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >> # Pacho Ramos (16 Sep 2012)
> >> # Upstream keeps inactive for ages and, then, it has broke again
> >> # now with gnutls-3 (#421385). Removal in a month.
> >> net-im/jabberd
> >
> > What about the 1.4
Brian Harring wrote:
> Comments?
: is used for namespaces elsewhere too. The familiarity is good.
//Peter
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 07:32:39PM +0300, Alex Alexander wrote:
>On Sep 16, 2012 4:55 PM, "Brian Harring" <[1]ferri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Folks-
>>
>> Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what
>I'm
>> proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:10:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 16 September 2012 03:51:04 Brian Harring wrote:
> > + if ! has $EAPI 0 1 2 3; then
> > + eqawarn "built_with_use should not be used in $EAPI; use USE
> > deps."
> > + elif has $EAPI 2 3; then
> > +
On Sunday 16 September 2012 03:51:04 Brian Harring wrote:
> + if ! has $EAPI 0 1 2 3; then
> + eqawarn "built_with_use should not be used in $EAPI; use USE
> deps."
> + elif has $EAPI 2 3; then
> + if [[ $hidden == yes ]] || $missing_was_set; then
> +
On Sunday 16 September 2012 11:01:00 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> also, you are missing some bug # for the 'broken deps' part. packages
> that have gained broken deps when the profile was marked 'dev', or that
> you committed with your profile.desc locally modified, do not count and
> are your fault act
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-09-16 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-db/pgpool 2012-09-16 12:21:52 pacho
dev-ruby/spruz 2012-09-16 12:24:30 pacho
dev-util/pkg-config-
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Not used by any ebuild in the tree, and dev-util/tla was removed four
>> years ago.
>>
>> Remove?
> Yes, please.
tla.class will be removed in 30 days then.
Sending to -dev-announce as required by policy.
> However, it should be moved to Sunrise
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:05:28 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> > Labels doesn't have this problem: it doesn't try to reuse an
> > existing syntax precisely because the existing syntax is extremely
> > awkward for this kind of thing.
>
> Labels have a human comprehension problem, and require a fair amo
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012, Alex Alexander wrote:
> Am I the only one who thinks that this dep:{build,...} thing looks
> really ugly and is hard to read?
+1
> IMO simply removing the "dep" part would greatly improve things:
> DEPENDENCIES="
> :build,run? ( ... )
> :run? ( ... )
> "
IMHO it woul
On Sep 16, 2012 4:55 PM, "Brian Harring" wrote:
>
> Folks-
>
> Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
> proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
>
> The live version of the doc is available at
>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependen
On 16 September 2012 23:40, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> # Pacho Ramos (16 Sep 2012)
>> # Upstream keeps inactive for ages and, then, it has broke again
>> # now with gnutls-3 (#421385). Removal in a month.
>> net-im/jabberd
>
> What about the 1.4 version? It depends on openssl, so
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:39:49PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > The live version of the doc is available at
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
> >
>
> I think you're being a bit
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> # Pacho Ramos (16 Sep 2012)
> # Upstream keeps inactive for ages and, then, it has broke again
> # now with gnutls-3 (#421385). Removal in a month.
> net-im/jabberd
What about the 1.4 version? It depends on openssl, so maybe it
doesn't have the gnutls issue.
I kinda like jab
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:47:56 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 September 2012 14:06:30 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:23:11 + (UTC) Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > vapier 12/08/28 00:23:11
> > >
> > > Modified: ChangeLog profiles.desc
> > > Log:
>
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> The live version of the doc is available at
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
>
I think you're being a bit glib with your dismissal of the labels
parsing scheme. You've got the following
Folks-
Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
The live version of the doc is available at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
Wording fixes will occur, but the core concept s
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 02:02:24PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:49:21 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
> > > Brian Harring wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 201
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:39:22PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 16 September 2012 09:20, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Dumps are at
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies-example/ .
> >
> > Herds, if you want to see what your pkgs would look like, look at
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/
# Pacho Ramos (16 Sep 2012)
# Dead upstream, fails tests (#315565), wasn't updated
# for recent MythTV versions. Removal in a month.
media-libs/gmyth
media-plugins/gst-plugins-mythtv
# Pacho Ramos (16 Sep 2012)
# Fails old-elibtoolize sanity check (#341721), has security
# issues. Removal in a m
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:49:21 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
> > Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > > But consider that for examp
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > But consider that for example Zac & AxS (correct me if I recall it
> > > correctly) considered ma
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > But consider that for example Zac & AxS (correct me if I recall it
> > correctly) considered making changing the meaning of RDEPEND to
> > install them before the build, t
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> But consider that for example Zac & AxS (correct me if I recall it
> correctly) considered making changing the meaning of RDEPEND to install
> them before the build, thus effectively making 'build,run' useless.
I really am not tryin
Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> Please see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430722, especially
> the final two posts.
I think the problem is that upstream isn't multilib-aware.
I also think that it would be awesome if Gentoo could handle such
situations for us. The brute force method would be t
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:20:26 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:03:36AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:33:18 -0700
> > Brian Harring wrote:
> > > To demonstrate the gain of this, we basically take the existing
> > > tree's deps, and re-render it into
At this point, the functionality built_with_use provides should
be covered near or more likely, in full, but USE deps in EAPI2 and
EAPI4; thus warn on usage.
While this may be a bit annoying, this is the only major consumer
left at this point that knows about /var/db/pkg layout; once that's
gone,
On 16 September 2012 09:20, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:03:36AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:33:18 -0700
>> Brian Harring wrote:
>> > To demonstrate the gain of this, we basically take the existing
>> > tree's deps, and re-render it into a unified D
31 matches
Mail list logo
