On 23 September 2012 18:40, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:33:58 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
>> El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
>> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:07:30 +0200
>> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> >
>> > > Matt Turner schrieb:
>> > > > On Sat, Sep 22,
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 23:37 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> - net-wireless/zd1201-firmware: No license in tarball or on homepage.
Ubuntu distributes it in their linux-firmware package with the following
LICENCE.zd1201 file:
The firmware was originally distributed by Zydas in their original drive
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> - net-misc/ntp: "as-is" looks fine as main license, although some
> parts of the code are under different licenses like GPL (but I
> haven't checked in detail what gets installed).
Uh, if we're distributing the sources, and they contain
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-09-23 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
Additions:
media-fonts/oxygen-fonts2012-09-18 07:22:02 johu
media-libs/glu 2012-09-18 23:24:45 chithanh
games-fps/serious-sam-
Hello,
Since my previous idea of DYNAMIC_SLOTS proved too complex to design
and implement, I would like to offer an another idea, based partially
on what Ciaran mentioned. Before I start getting into details, I'd like
to know your opinions, and what possible problems am I missing. To keep
it clean
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, hasufell wrote:
>> If we really decide to move things to a new license file, then I'd
>> rather avoid the name "as-is" because it is partly the reason for
>> the confusion.
> I agree on that. I saw it more than once that people use "as-is" for
> the license, just becau
On 09/23/2012 03:02 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/23/2012 11:56 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> So i would prefer some help/support with multilib-portage to get
>>> it accepted sooner, instead of this additional workaround for a
>>> subset of packages.
>
>> I prefer the simpler solution.
>
>
> I prefe
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> One problem that I remembered now:
> If every ebuild inheritting this eclass (either this one or similar)
> will add a "multilib" USE, people running multilib profiles will get it
> enabled for ALL packages inheritting it, causing them to see h
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Matt Turner schrieb:
>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
>>> packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported.
>>
>> Thanks a lot, Michał! This
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:02 AM, hasufell wrote:
> I prefer the stronger solution. This is just a quick workaround.
And I'd prefer if people who aren't involved with what I'm working on
don't try to block my progress.
I appreciate your opinion, and truthfully I'd just rather have portage
handle
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
> On 22/09/2012 20:42, Matt Turner wrote:
>> I think this means "make 32-bit binary packages' dependencies on amd64
>> not use the emul- packages"? If so, that'd certainly be a component of
>> getting rid of emul-linux-x86-xlibs. It's not
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:26:55 +0200
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Michał, Pacho, and everyone else who suck epically at this:
>
> CAN YOU FFS START TO TRIM QUOTES IN YOUR EMAILS!
I've trimmed them in the next e-mail to the one you replied to :P.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:47:44 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:21:20 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:46:02 -0300
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:24:46 +0200
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is a simple eclass u
On 22/09/2012 20:42, Matt Turner wrote:
> I think this means "make 32-bit binary packages' dependencies on amd64
> not use the emul- packages"? If so, that'd certainly be a component of
> getting rid of emul-linux-x86-xlibs. It's not in the scope of my
> project to get rid of /all/ of the emul- pac
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:21:20 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:46:02 -0300
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:24:46 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to
> > > build packages for multiple ABIs w
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 13:52 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribió:
>> Pacho Ramos schrieb:
>>> El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:07:30 +0200
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Matt Turner schrieb:
>> On Sat, Sep 22, 201
Michał, Pacho, and everyone else who suck epically at this:
CAN YOU FFS START TO TRIM QUOTES IN YOUR EMAILS!
Thank you
//Peter
pgpJmV3IkjFsp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
El sáb, 22-09-2012 a las 23:24 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
> packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported.
>
> Use case: xorg packages, ask Matt.
> ---
> gx86/eclass/autotools-multilib.eclass | 72
>
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:05:58 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/23/2012 12:40 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:02:01 +0200 hasufell
> > wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 09/23/2012 11:56
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 13:52 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribió:
> Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> > El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> >> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:07:30 +0200
> >> Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >>
> >>> Matt Turner schrieb:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Gór
On 09/23/2012 02:04 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> If we really decide to move things to a new license file, then I'd
> rather avoid the name "as-is" because it is partly the reason for the
> confusion.
I agree on that. I saw it more than once that people use "as-is" for the
license, just because the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/2012 12:40 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:02:01 +0200 hasufell
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/23/2012 11:56 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
So i would prefer some help/support with mul
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Well, I can see legal problems any time you take a thousand things
> that all have a bunch of non-identical, informal licenses and treat
> them as the same. However, I don't think it is practical to do
> otherwise.
I agree. Creating hundreds of li
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 13:30:41 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 13:13 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 13:03:56 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > > That would be better as there are a ton of ebuilds not inheritting
> > > autotools-utils.eclass even being
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:07:30 +0200
>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>
>>> Matt Turner schrieb:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 13:13 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 13:03:56 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 12:40 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:33:58 +0200
> > > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > >
> > > > El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:5
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> So, either we should only mark free software with the as-is label.
> Then it might help if the text was clarified as in the patch below.
>
> Or we continue marking random non-free stuff with as-is. Then we
> should IMHO remove as-is from our
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 13:03:56 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 12:40 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:33:58 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > > El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:07:30 +0200
>
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 12:40 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:33:58 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:07:30 +0200
> > > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> > >
> > > > Matt Turner schrieb:
> > >
>From time to time cases like the following are brought up to
licen...@gentoo.org, for a package that is labelled with
LICENSE="as-is":
| Permission to use, copy, modify and/or distribute this software in
| both binary and source form, for non-commercial purposes, is hereby
| granted [...]
This i
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:02:01 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/23/2012 11:56 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> So i would prefer some help/support with multilib-portage to get
> >> it accepted sooner, instead of this additional workaround for a
> >> sub
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:33:58 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:07:30 +0200
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >
> > > Matt Turner schrieb:
> > > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > >> It is a simp
El dom, 23-09-2012 a las 11:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:07:30 +0200
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> > Matt Turner schrieb:
> > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > >> It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
> > >> package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/2012 11:56 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> So i would prefer some help/support with multilib-portage to get
>> it accepted sooner, instead of this additional workaround for a
>> subset of packages.
>
> I prefer the simpler solution.
>
I prefer t
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:07:30 +0200
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Matt Turner schrieb:
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
> >> packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported.
> >
> > Thanks a lot, Mich
On 09/19/2012 04:00 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> Thanks for all you have done maintaining VLC all those years. It is
> undoubtedly one of the most popular and versatile video players out
> there. I really hope someone steps up to become its new dedicated
> maintainer.
Given I'm in contact with upstre
Matt Turner schrieb:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
>> packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported.
>
> Thanks a lot, Michał! This looks good to me.
>
>> Use case: xorg packages, ask Matt.
>
El sáb, 22-09-2012 a las 22:37 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:41:24 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > This comes from:
> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260536
> >
> > In that one, we try to use the following:
> > has vala ${IUSE//+/} && !
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:46:02 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:24:46 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
> > packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported.
> >
>
> to some extent, can't you do the same
39 matches
Mail list logo
