On 26/09/2012 15:57, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> That sound like a plan. Maybe bzip2 should become a virtual as busybox
> also provides an implementation.
No, just, no.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> 2012/9/26 Mike Gilbert :
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
>>> wrote:
Michael Mol schrieb:
> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask th
2012/9/26 Mike Gilbert :
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
>> wrote:
>>> Michael Mol schrieb:
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
media be replaced with
pbzip2.
>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> wrote:
>> Michael Mol schrieb:
>>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
>>> media be replaced with
>>> pbzip2.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, p
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:02:57 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:02PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:29:17 -0700
> > Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:3
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Michael Mol schrieb:
>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
>> media be replaced with
>> pbzip2.
>
> If I understand correctly, pbzip2 depends on bzip2. So what you are
> asking is that pbzip2
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 26.09.2012 22:43, schrieb Matt Turner:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
>>> media be replaced with
>>> pbzip2. It was closed a short while
Michael Mol schrieb:
> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
> media be replaced with
> pbzip2.
If I understand correctly, pbzip2 depends on bzip2. So what you are
asking is that pbzip2 is preferred over bzip2 when both are installed,
and that pbzip2 is installed b
On 09/26/2012 11:02 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>
> So yes, I want it actually finalized. Bluntly; there's zero point
> having the council comment if it ain't finalized.
>
I understand. We probably have to wait for it then.
Meanwhile... is there an alternative approach?
Am 26.09.2012 22:43, schrieb Matt Turner:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
>> media be replaced with
>> pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
>> involve changing what's kept in
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:02PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:29:17 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:39 -0700
> > > Brian Harring wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 201
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
> media be replaced with
> pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
> involve changing what's kept in @system, and that had to be discussed
> here, ra
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
media be replaced with
pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
involve changing what's kept in @system, and that had to be discussed
here, rather than in a bug report.
Here's a detailed description of ho
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:29:17 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:39 -0700
> > Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:58:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:47:3
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:35:37AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:12:56 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:09:49AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Since my previous idea of DYNAMIC_SLOTS proved too complex to design
> > > an
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
> > proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
> >
> > The live version of the doc is available a
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:39 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:58:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:47:33 -0400
> > > Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > >
> > > > Based on the abo
On 26/09/12 08:24, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:17:03 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
# Samuli Suominen (25 Sep 2012)
# Multiple build failures: #435394, #423991 and #425806
# Other bugs: #270830, #368409
# Unmasking would require addressing the build failure bugs
# Removal in 30 days
18 matches
Mail list logo
