[gentoo-dev] Re: OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread Duncan
William Hubbs posted on Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:02:35 -0600 as excerpted: I would like to make OpenRC-0.11.4 the next stable candidate for OpenRC. We need it before we can stable a newer genkernel, and releng also needs it stable for the install cds. Because of this, I am interested in moving it

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread XMs
After upgrade i got this: … * The dependency data could not be migrated to /run/openrc … I don't have /run/ in my system and can't find anything about it in FHS (by «man hier», maybe i have old version?). Does it mean i have to create /run/ directory, or OpenRC still can work without it?

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Alexis Ballier
Hi, [...] --- ChangeLog 27 Sep 2012 22:42:48 - 1.417 +++ ChangeLog 28 Sep 2012 15:07:30 - 1.418 @@ -1,6 +1,11 @@ # ChangeLog for eclass directory # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2 -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/ChangeLog,v

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 06:57 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: Hi, [...] --- ChangeLog27 Sep 2012 22:42:48 - 1.417 +++ ChangeLog 28 Sep 2012 15:07:30 - 1.418 @@ -1,6 +1,11 @@ # ChangeLog for eclass directory # Copyright 1999-2012

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON - PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 05 novembre 2012 à 16:48 -0800, Brian Harring a écrit : Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor stop the efforts to dig us out of the python.eclass mess. That said, *this time around* that eclass should actually have a plan so that we don't wind up in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 05:17 AM, XMs wrote: After upgrade i got this: … * The dependency data could not be migrated to /run/openrc … I don't have /run/ in my system and can't find anything about it in FHS (by «man hier», maybe i have old version?). Does it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:11:44 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] Sure -- note, though, that if $type == kern and $KV is unset, then this function does *NOT* return valid values. only if you hit the case where its needed It might be worthwhile looking up why $type == kern on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 08:30 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:11:44 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] Sure -- note, though, that if $type == kern and $KV is unset, then this function does *NOT* return valid values. only

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:57:05 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 08:30 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:11:44 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] Sure -- note, though, that if $type ==

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:29:05AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 05:17 AM, XMs wrote: After upgrade i got this: … * The dependency data could not be migrated to /run/openrc … I don't have /run/ in my system and can't find

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 09:09 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:57:05 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 08:30 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:11:44

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/06/2012 09:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote: On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:29:05AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 05:17 AM, XMs wrote: After upgrade i got this: … * The dependency data

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON - PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 06 novembre 2012 à 14:13 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : [snip] Forgot to add that obviously, as already explained by Michał, distutils-r1 being (almost) the only demo out there to make use of this new eclass, most the of little things that would make it a success may still be

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON - PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:54:45PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote: This isn't quite what I'm asking for. I want y'all to literally document thus: 1)

Re: [gentoo-dev] spotify license

2012-11-06 Thread Matthew Thode
On 10/29/2012 09:17 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because of licensing concerns. http://www.spotify.com/us/legal/end-user-agreement/ 10:02 prometheanfire do you have a plaintext version? I can copy the text, but just thought I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] spotify license

2012-11-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: One option that's been presented to me is to add restrict mirror (I don't think restricting fetch is needed, but meh what do I know). That sound acceptable? The last time I looked at the ebuild that was already

[gentoo-dev] tools-portage herd unmaintained packages

2012-11-06 Thread Paul Varner
All: The following packages in the tools-portage herd are effectively unmaintained packages and need a maintainer to step up and maintain them. app-portage/deltup app-portage/epm app-portage/maintainer-helper app-portage/splat app-portage/ufed If no one steps up in the next 30 days, I will be

Re: [gentoo-dev] spotify license

2012-11-06 Thread Matthew Thode
On 11/06/2012 12:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: One option that's been presented to me is to add restrict mirror (I don't think restricting fetch is needed, but meh what do I know). That sound acceptable? The last

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 06-11-2012 a las 00:02 -0600, William Hubbs escribió: All, I would like to make OpenRC-0.11.4 the next stable candidate for OpenRC. We need it before we can stable a newer genkernel, and releng also needs it stable for the install cds. Because of this, I am interested in moving it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:53:44 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 09:09 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:57:05 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON - PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:31:07PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote: Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor stop the efforts to dig us out of the python.eclass mess. That said, *this time around* that

Re: [gentoo-dev] spotify license

2012-11-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: So you think we need to restrict fetch so we can let the user know about the licensing thing? No. If a user wants Gentoo to help them stay on top of their licenses there is already a mechanism for this -