I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable.
The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the
way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new
openrc stable because of the cds/isos being broken.
There hadn't been bugs reported,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable.
The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the
way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new
openrc stable
# Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org (07 Dec 2012)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. (07 Jan 2012)
# Upstream says the project is dead and is being replaced
app-emulation/qemulator
--
Doug Goldstein
Hey people, what are we going to do with bugs like:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421839
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445848
I'd like to help with things. Is the process of building livecd .isos
and stages documented somewhere? I'd like to reproduce problems locally,
work on
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hey people, what are we going to do with bugs like:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421839
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445848
I'd like to help with things. Is the process of building livecd
# Tomáš Chvátal scarabeus@ (04 Nov 2012)
# Masked for testing with gcc-4.7 and to verify reverse deps
dev-libs/icu-49.9.1
I think with icu-50.1-r2 the problems are solved. It should get more
testing in ~arch. I'd like to unmask it.
WDYT?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sounds good to me. Tinderbox was fine with the latest changes to icu.
Just for reference, next time it would be nice to unmask this when chromium
and libreoffice are both bumped (i.e., two days ago), so that people don't
have to rebuild them twice... luckily for me I kept it unmasked when
testing
